Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Wed Aug 28, 2019, 06:30 PM Aug 2019

New fossil reveals face of 'Lucy' ancestor who lived almost 4 million years ago

https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/new-fossil-reveals-face-lucy-ancestor-who-lived-almost-4-ncna1047431

A fossil from Ethiopia is letting scientists look millions of years into our evolutionary history — and they see a face peering back.

The find, from 3.8 million years ago, reveals the face for a presumed ancestor of the species famously represented by Lucy, the celebrated Ethiopian partial skeleton found in 1974.

This ancestral species is the oldest known member of Australopithecus, a grouping of creatures that preceded our own branch of the family tree, called Homo.

Scientists have long known that this species — A. anamensis — existed, and previous fossils of it extend back to 4.2 million years ago. But the discovered facial remains were limited to jaws and teeth. The newly reported fossil includes much of the skull and face.

<more>

Our ancestors were amazing - if they weren't, we would not be here....



10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New fossil reveals face of 'Lucy' ancestor who lived almost 4 million years ago (Original Post) jpak Aug 2019 OP
You said... jimmil Aug 2019 #1
Common ancestry - and descendants jpak Aug 2019 #2
the newest research says the branches of the *tree* crossed each other. Kurt V. Aug 2019 #3
Are you suggesting that our forebears fooled around? tclambert Aug 2019 #7
Australopithecus are not our ancestors ... jb5150 Aug 2019 #4
So, which fossil Hominin was? jpak Aug 2019 #8
Considering what we now know about interbreeding between H. sapiens and Neanderthals and Denisovans Spider Jerusalem Aug 2019 #9
How did Australopithecus folks cut their nails? pangaia Aug 2019 #5
She's *CUTE*!1 - I'd buy her a beer, play some juke box, cut a rug!1 UTUSN Aug 2019 #6
She's a beauty! lunatica Aug 2019 #10

jimmil

(629 posts)
1. You said...
Wed Aug 28, 2019, 07:11 PM
Aug 2019

"Our ancestors were amazing - if they weren't, we would not be here.... " If you follow Lucy's branch of the evolutionary tree you would find it does not lead to modern humans. It was just another failed attempt by nature to push the tree of life.

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
7. Are you suggesting that our forebears fooled around?
Wed Aug 28, 2019, 09:34 PM
Aug 2019

Sounds about right. That idea pretty much invalidates every family tree.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
9. Considering what we now know about interbreeding between H. sapiens and Neanderthals and Denisovans
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 04:01 AM
Aug 2019

it's highly likely that there was episodic interbreeding between reproductively compatible hominin species going very far back into our ancestry. (Neanderthals weren't thought to be our ancestors until the study of ancient DNA revealed otherwise.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New fossil reveals face o...