General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump puts allies and US troops in extreme danger
Trump has dismissed more than a dozen North Korean missile tests in recent months as very standard, and appears unwilling to make statements or take actions that could jeopardize his relationship with Kim Jong-un, the North Korean leader.
Trump explained Kim Jon UN, just likes testing missiles.
Now, American intelligence officials and outside experts have come to a far different conclusion: that the launchings downplayed by Mr. Trump, including two late last month, have allowed Mr. Kim to test missiles with greater range and maneuverability that could overwhelm American defenses in the region.
The rapid improvements in the short-range missiles not only put Japan and South Korea in increased danger, but also threaten at least eight American bases in those countries housing more than 30,000 troops, according to an analysis of the missile ranges by The New York Times. Such missiles, experts say, could be designed to carry either conventional or nuclear warheads.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/02/world/asia/north-korea-kim-trump-missiles.html?te=1&nl=morning-briefing&emc=edit_NN_p_20190903§ion=topNews?campaign_id=9&instance_id=12081&segment_id=16675&user_id=cd25229822fb6350f11c6cb7ab0d25e8®i_id=90467985tion=topNews
hlthe2b
(102,411 posts)Damn
underpants
(182,938 posts)Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)"We're in love?"
underpants
(182,938 posts)Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Do you remember when media criticized Michele Obama for wearing a classy sleeveless dress to a formal occasion?
How do the hypocrites justify this photograph?
oldsoftie
(12,623 posts)Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Personally, I have no problem with homosexuality either; But, somehow First Lady nudity is simply not presidential.
Anyhow, what about this Trump fashion choice?
It's the jacket that set off a firestorm on Twitter. Before flying to an immigrant children's shelter down in Texas, First Lady Melania Trump wore a green cargo jacket from Zara painted with the words I Really Dont Care, Do U?," according to The Cut, which honestly was... not great when it comes to the optics of the whole situation. Almost immediately, people started commenting on Melania's fashion choice, and quite a few comparisons were made regarding the clothing Michelle Obama was once criticized for versus the clothing Melania Trump has been criticized for.
I understand the dismay surrounding Melania's choice of jacket for the trip I legitimately wondered if it was photoshopped, or someone had compared it to the wrong jacket online while doing research into her outfit. But indeed, pictures from the Associated Press showed the first lady wearing the jacket in question when she boarded a plane at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland, as she made her way to Texas to visit the United States-Mexico border and a shelter there for immigrant children.
https://www.romper.com/p/heres-clothing-michelle-obama-was-criticized-for-vs-clothing-melania-trump-has-been-criticized-for-9552765
Farmer-Rick
(10,216 posts)After She met Trump......That's what a Trumper said to me in the VA hospital. He didn't seem to care when I pointed out some of her nude photo spreads came out while they were dating. I asked what kind of example does this set for our young daughters. He just shrugged.
It's not important to Trumpers what the women around Trump do. They can be pedophiles for all they care. Russia has paid off evangelical leaders and those that follow these leaders don't question them too much. They do what they are told and never question.
Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)CrispyQ
(36,534 posts)If a dem president had a porn star wife, oh my! If a dem president had colluded with Russia, well, he'd be impeached already. They are hypocrites of the highest order & either don't see it or don't care. I can't respect people like that.
Farmer-Rick
(10,216 posts)He was going on and on about Bill Clinton. But didn't have a problem with Trump cheating on multiple wives with porn stars over and over again. And it was A OK by him to have a Slovenian Sex Worker as a first lady...who lied on her citizenship application, plagiarizes Michelle Obama and who Really Doesn't Care.
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Trueblue Texan
(2,445 posts)Farmer-Rick
(10,216 posts)There's also the one where she is fingering herself that really puts the first in first lady.
Bayard
(22,172 posts)Don't recognize her.
Champp
(2,114 posts)Get a clue Republicans
Martin Eden
(12,878 posts)It doesn't help that this POtuS has played the naive fool to Kim's machinations, but we're certainly not going to start a shooting war over these tests.
Butterflylady
(3,550 posts)Kim's laughing the whole time.
former9thward
(32,096 posts)NK is a sovereign country not subject to any treaties. Sanctions do not work with a country that is dirt poor anyway.
Cosmocat
(14,575 posts)Don't do what the asshole is doing, first off. Get into a childish twitter spat with the lunatic dicator, and enflame the situation to the point where Hawaii thought it was getting nuked. THEN, after that, spend the next year plus giving them photo ops and act submissive like a she dog.
Do's - work to build the international coalition needed to try to keep NK in a box. Instead of getting into a trade war with China, try to do the diplomacy needed to get them on board with doing what needs to be done with NK.
former9thward
(32,096 posts)And it was long ago. That aside NK is a client state of China and China will never be on board. Every U.S. president since Truman has attempted to build international coalitions against NK and all have failed. NK is still there and their leadership has not changed its ideology one millimeter.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)is more or less accurate, it's not TRUMP'S thinking in this situation, you can be sure of that.
Pretty sure we've had accords (with backing of our our allies) where NK was at least held in check for periods of time, but Trump has no use for anything where he doesn't get ALL the credit for being the special deal-making snowflake he imagines himself to be.
Trump's go-it-alone policy is going to accomplish far, far LESS in making NK less dangerous than someone with a plan to bring international pressure to bear against the rogue state, of that I'm nearly certain.
KJU is playing MF45 like a fiddle ... he'd not be able to do that against any other world leader.
Bettie
(16,130 posts)he'd have to do it before the election.
No new president would just let it go. This one would though, with a wave and declaration that it never happened.
Ohiogal
(32,106 posts)What if Obama dismissed all this missile testing. Republicans heads would be exploding.
former9thward
(32,096 posts)The U.S. made no response to any of them. Do you favor invasion? What is the alternative?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_North_Korean_missile_tests
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)This is from an old edition of The Wall Street Journal:
Barack Obama Warns Donald Trump on North Korea Threat
White House says new presidents top foreign priority should be nuclear Pyongyang
By Gerald F. Seib, Jay Solomon and Carol E. Lee
Nov. 22, 2016 5:54 pm ET
The Obama administration considers North Korea to be the top national security priority for the incoming administration, a view it has conveyed to President-elect Donald Trumps transition team, according to people familiar with the conversations.
President Barack Obama, in a policy of strategic patience, refused to engage his administration in high-level negotiations with North Korea...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-faces-north-korean-challenge-1479855286
former9thward
(32,096 posts)What I posted was true and your response had nothing to do with it.
In fact the Obama administration DID attempt to negotiate with NK
January 2009 December 2009
Obama Attempts Diplomatic Restart
President Barack Obama takes office signaling a willingness to revive the Six Party Talks, but these efforts are initially rebuffed by North Korea, which launches a rocket believed to be a modified version of its long-range ballistic missile. It also ejects international monitors from its nuclear facilities in April and the following month tests a second nuclear device, which carries a yield of two to eight kilotons. In December, Obama administration officials hold their first bilateral meetings with their North Korean counterparts.
https://www.cfr.org/timeline/north-korean-nuclear-negotiations
Of course the talks went nowhere just like all other U.S. attempts.
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)While Obama refused to have personal dialog with the North Korean dictatorship, his spokesman DID respond to a 4th of July North Korean nuclear test.
United States: State Department spokesman Karl Duckworth said the tests were "not helpful" and warned North Korea not to aggravate tensions.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_North_Korean_missile_tests
Former White House Officials Say President Trump 'Is Lying' Over Claims Obama Tried to Meet With Kim Jong Un
And, like previous US Presidents, Obama never graced the tiny dictatorship with a single visit, much less a claim that he was "in love" with Kim Jong Un.
https://time.com/5617952/trump-lying-obama-kim-jong-un/
In addition, cfr.org is currently under Trump's thumb.
former9thward
(32,096 posts)Wow that changed NK policy didn't it? I quoted from the Council on Foreign Relations. I guess you don't like them either...
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"They are making millions off of Trump. Why shouldn't they donate some to wounded veterans..."
(I too pretend I know what people like based off a simple inference)
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)And there is a LOT of internet cleaning occurring these days, especially on recent political facts. As for actual history Wikipedia is great.
Also, I believe every website that ends in .gov and .org because none of them have an agenda!
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)ck4829
(35,094 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)I'm talking about elected leaders, not the rank and file.
former9thward
(32,096 posts)What policies has any American president had which have worked with NK? There have been none. What is the alternative?
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)means of dealing w/the problem, do you?
Cause if so ...
former9thward
(32,096 posts)I just want to know what the alternative is? When a Democrat is in power the Republicans attack him for not doing anything. When a Republican is in power the Democrats attack him for not doing anything. They are both doing the same things and nothing is working. Why not just admit reality? Sanctions don't work on countries that are already dirt poor.
ck4829
(35,094 posts)I mean it is, but you know, one with forced labor mines down the road.
Bayard
(22,172 posts)Is that Kim responds lovingly to tRump. And then does whatever the hell he wants.