General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTwo Kentucky miners shown in Amy McGrath (Dem senate candidate) ad want it taken down. Here's why.
https://www.kentucky.com/news/politics-government/article234737737.htmlThe ad, which McGrath launched August 23, featured a reenactment of a group of miners who made a 10 hour bus trip to Washington D.C. to ask U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to restore a higher tax on coal companies to help fund the federal Black Lung Disability Trust Fund. Some of the miners were disappointed that McConnell only spent a brief time with them.
Two of the miners who went on the trip and were featured in the ad, Randy Robbins and Albrow Hall, said through an attorney that they were led to believe the footage was being used for a documentary for the Black Lung Association and that they did not know and were never told they were being filmed for a political advertisement
(snip)
The McGrath campaign pushed back at the miners claim they were unaware the filming was for an ad, pointing out that both miners signed release forms. The forms, though, granted permission for Putnam Partners, McGraths ad consultant, to use their image in promotional materials. It did not mention McGrath by name.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)Why create problems when you don't need to?
I imagine there are plenty of coal miners willing to be in her ads.
cabot
(724 posts)I can't say I blame them. However, one would think a person would ask, "hey, what is this for?" before agreeing to be in it.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,327 posts)Black Lung Association.
marble falls
(57,079 posts)blm
(113,047 posts)Damn.
AJT
(5,240 posts)exboyfil
(17,862 posts)Unless she knew about the terms of the agreement and went forward. In that case, she has even bigger problems.
Thekaspervote
(32,757 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)It's done what needed to be done
OAITW r.2.0
(24,455 posts)Sorry, I always wonder how Republicans use their money to ratfuck Democrats.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)Her ad firm needs to be transparent that the footage will be used by the campaign of XXXX for XXXXX.
However I dont discount the idea they may have known but backtracked after getting shit from family and neighbors.
Either way her team needs to edit them out and offer an apology.