General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump drains US spending in Europe to pay for wall with Mexico
Trump drains US spending in Europe to pay for wall with Mexico
https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2019/09/05/trump-drains-us-spending-in-europe-to-pay-for-wall-with-mexico/
WASHINGTON Defense Secretary suggested European allies replenish the $771 million meant to shore up Europes defensive posture against Russia to fund President Donald Trumps U.S.-Mexico border barrier.
The announcement is sure to jar European allies, where NATO members have nervously watched the presidents on-again, off-again commitment to the alliance. And it could deal a blow to the narrative among allies that Trumps boisterous rhetoric should be taken with a grain of salt, given that money has kept flowing from Washington despite trans-Atlantic disagreements.
Half of the $3.6 billion for the border wall would come from dozens of U.S. military construction projects, and the other half would come from projects in Europe and the Pacific. In Europe, there were roughly 40 projects, including training facilities for special forces in Estonia and aviation infrastructure in Germany, Hungary and Slovakia.
Trump is gambling that Congress and allies will eventually restore the money used for the wall, he originally said Mexico would pay for. Defense Secretary Mark Esper suggested that European nations should consider funding projects in their countries.
The message that Ive been carrying, since when I was acting secretary to today, has been about the increase in burden sharing, Esper told reporters in London late on Thursday.
So part of the message will be Look, if youre really concerned then maybe you should look to cover those projects for us because thats going to build infrastructure in many cases in their countries, he added.
As it stands, the maneuver will weaken NATO efforts to deter Russia, feed growing doubts that America would come to Europes defense and undermine extensive plans to strengthen NATOs eastern flank, according to former U.S. Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder, now president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
If you looked at the state of the alliance, you could say the bad news was the presidents rhetoric was problematic for alliance unity, but the administrations growing investment suggested on a sub-political level the alliance was getting stronger, Daalder said Thursday. I can no longer make that argument because weve just [signaled] were going to cut back on that investment.
<<snip>>
bdamomma
(63,803 posts)by his "wall" push back to were he would just retreat, fucking bully wants his wall and screw everyone else.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Bet both are big and bountiful
And helps daddy Putin too with moves like above
Double ++