Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,280 posts)
Sun Sep 8, 2019, 12:24 AM Sep 2019

The Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution

Congressional Research Service
Updated August 23, 2019

... The Foreign Emoluments Clause (art. I, § 9, cl. 8): “<N>o Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under
<the United States>, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or
Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

The Domestic Emoluments Clause (a.k.a. the Presidential Emoluments Clause) (art. II, § 1, cl. 7):
“The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation which shall neither be
encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within
that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them” ...

... The purpose of the Foreign Emoluments Clause is to prevent corruption and limit foreign influence on federal
officers. The Clause grew out of the Framers’ experience with the European custom of gift-giving to foreign
diplomats, which the Articles of Confederation prohibited. Following that precedent, the Foreign Emoluments Clause prohibits federal officers from accepting foreign emoluments without congressional consent. The purpose of the Domestic Emoluments Clause is to preserve the President’s independence. Under the Clause, Congress may neither increase nor decrease the President’s compensation during his term, preventing the legislature
from using its control over the President’s salary to exert influence over him. To further preserve presidential
independence, the Clause prohibits a sitting President from receiving emoluments from federal or state governments, except for his fixed salary ...

Black’s Law Dictionary defines an “emolument” as an “advantage, profit, or gain received as a result of one’s
employment or one’s holding of office.” There is significant debate as to precisely what constitutes an
emolument within the meaning of the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses, particularly as to whether it
includes private, arm’s-length market transactions. The only two courts to decide this issue adopted a broad definition of “Emolument” as reaching any benefit, gain, or advantage, including profits from private market transactions not arising from an office or employ ...

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/IF11086.pdf

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution (Original Post) struggle4progress Sep 2019 OP
Thank you for posting. smirkymonkey Sep 2019 #1
Violating the emoluments clause would certainly be an "impeachable offense". n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2019 #2
I'm not so sure. A blowjob seems far more heinous RainCaster Sep 2019 #4
Kick dalton99a Sep 2019 #3
Thank you for posting this. StarryNite Sep 2019 #5
Only two courts, eh? Kinda like the 2nd Amendment before things got serious... TreasonousBastard Sep 2019 #6

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
6. Only two courts, eh? Kinda like the 2nd Amendment before things got serious...
Sun Sep 8, 2019, 03:19 AM
Sep 2019

Impeachment means the House defines things, but the Senate is under no obligation to agree with those definitions.

The foreign clause seems clear-- no federal worker can receive anything of value from a foreigner, or foreign government. The other clause says he can't get any money over his salary from the state or federal governments.

So, he can't raise his pay, and he can't take "presents" from furriners. If the Saudis pay rack rates for the rooms, is that a foreign "gift"? Is there any specific law that's broken when Barr rents his club for a party?

Since there are myriad other tax and corruption laws and rules involves, this could get interesting.

And many lawyers could get rich-- I assume Trump pays his own legal fees for impeachment or criminal investigtion.1

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Emoluments Clauses of...