Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,766 posts)
Mon Sep 9, 2019, 08:25 PM Sep 2019

Proposed ban on Pentagon spending at Trump properties gets new push

Democrats in the House are doubling down on proposed legislation to block military funds from being spent at properties owned by President Donald Trump, following reports that Air Force personnel stayed at the president's Turnberry resort in Scotland.

The House voted in July to bar the Defense Department from spending money at nearly five dozen Trump properties worldwide — including Trump Turnberry — as part of annual defense policy legislation.

"The House sent a clear message by adopting our amendment in July that we will not allow taxpayer funds, including the defense budget, to be used to enrich the President," Rep. Don Beyer, one of the sponsors of the proposal, told POLITICO in a statement Monday.

The provision blocks the Pentagon from spending money at 57 specific Trump properties. Under the provision, Trump could waive the ban if he reimburses the Treasury Department for the expenses. The amendment was co-sponsored by Democrats Ted Lieu of California, Beyer, Pramila Jayapal of Washington state and Steve Cohen of Tennessee and was adopted in a 223-205 vote.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/proposed-ban-on-pentagon-spending-at-trump-properties-gets-new-push/ar-AAH2IRz?li=BBnbcA1

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Proposed ban on Pentagon spending at Trump properties gets new push (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2019 OP
Lucrum interruptus Thomas Hurt Sep 2019 #1
You would think the emolument clause drray23 Sep 2019 #2
Exactly! Takket Sep 2019 #3
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Proposed ban on Pentagon ...