Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInstead of Fixing Their Gerrymander, North Carolina Republicans Are Trolling the Court
North Carolina republicans are daring the court to hold them in contempt https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/09/north-carolina-republicans-gerrymander-trolling-court.html
After essentially flipping off the court, Republican legislators got to work drawing the new districts. They quickly settled on a plan to get around the ban on partisan gerrymandering. Lawmakers announced that they would work off maps created by Jowei Chen, a political scientist who served as an expert for the plaintiffs in this case.
Their stated plan is to identify which if Chens maps best comports to the courts guidelines and adopt them with minimal alterations.
There are many problems with this plan. First, and most obviously, Chen did not draw the maps in public hearings, as the court demanded. The court even clarified that any relevant computer screen must be visible to legislators and public observers to prevent subtle chicanery.
Second, Chens maps were never intended to serve as a model for redistricting. Instead, they were created as evidence to gauge the severity of the existing gerrymander. Chen ran 1,000 simulations for both the house and senate maps using non-partisan districting criteria but allowing for incumbency protection. Every single map produced more seats for Republicans; not a single one exhibited the same extreme level of Republican bias. The court relied upon these maps to illustrate just how extensively the GOP gerrymander diluted Democratic votes. Legislators claimed that Chens maps can serve as a baseline for redistricting because they have already been accepted by the court. That is simply false. The court never said accepted these plans as remedial maps, but as evidence of the current maps infirmity.
Third, working off Chens maps will allow Republicans to smuggle partisan bias into the new plan. These maps, after all, were drawn using a simulation designed to protect incumbents. And most incumbents at that time were Republicans because of the partisan gerrymander. As Chen explained, the maps therefore distort[ed] the partisan distribution of voters across districts to favor Republicans. In other words, they have a built-in partisan bias. Moreover, Republican legislators, who are very familiar with the partisan distribution of voters at this point, can easily assess which simulated maps have the most bias toward the GOP. They will then rank their favorite plans and use a lottery machine to select which ones they will use. This performance is a bit mystifying since the finalists will all be extremely similarand, most likely, extremely favorable to Republicans.
Their stated plan is to identify which if Chens maps best comports to the courts guidelines and adopt them with minimal alterations.
There are many problems with this plan. First, and most obviously, Chen did not draw the maps in public hearings, as the court demanded. The court even clarified that any relevant computer screen must be visible to legislators and public observers to prevent subtle chicanery.
Second, Chens maps were never intended to serve as a model for redistricting. Instead, they were created as evidence to gauge the severity of the existing gerrymander. Chen ran 1,000 simulations for both the house and senate maps using non-partisan districting criteria but allowing for incumbency protection. Every single map produced more seats for Republicans; not a single one exhibited the same extreme level of Republican bias. The court relied upon these maps to illustrate just how extensively the GOP gerrymander diluted Democratic votes. Legislators claimed that Chens maps can serve as a baseline for redistricting because they have already been accepted by the court. That is simply false. The court never said accepted these plans as remedial maps, but as evidence of the current maps infirmity.
Third, working off Chens maps will allow Republicans to smuggle partisan bias into the new plan. These maps, after all, were drawn using a simulation designed to protect incumbents. And most incumbents at that time were Republicans because of the partisan gerrymander. As Chen explained, the maps therefore distort[ed] the partisan distribution of voters across districts to favor Republicans. In other words, they have a built-in partisan bias. Moreover, Republican legislators, who are very familiar with the partisan distribution of voters at this point, can easily assess which simulated maps have the most bias toward the GOP. They will then rank their favorite plans and use a lottery machine to select which ones they will use. This performance is a bit mystifying since the finalists will all be extremely similarand, most likely, extremely favorable to Republicans.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 722 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Instead of Fixing Their Gerrymander, North Carolina Republicans Are Trolling the Court (Original Post)
Gothmog
Sep 2019
OP
Gothmog
(143,998 posts)1. The Senate Redistricting Committee just brought in freaking lottery officials to randomly draw a map