Fri Sep 13, 2019, 10:05 PM
Takket (18,696 posts)

Is there an actual definition of "privileged" when it comes to the executive branch?
because it seems now that that word means "anything that could incriminate drumpf so I don't want to tell you." Another thread is on the bard about a whistle-blower claim being suppressed because it might be "privileged". Hope Hicks refused to even say what OFFICE she worked in.
How can a whistle-blower claim possibly be privileged? This implies a crime was committed, or at least a violation of established government policy, and I don't understand how either of those two things could be "privilged".
Or is all this just a matter of, "we'll do whatever the fuck we want, and have fun dragging it through the courts for a year if you ever want to know"
|
1 replies, 358 views
Reply to this thread
Back to top Alert abuse
Replies to this discussion thread
1 replies |
Author |
Time |
Post |
 Is there an actual definition of "privileged" when it comes to the executive branch? (Original post) |
Takket |
Sep 2019 |
OP |
|
Claritie Pixie |
Sep 2019 |
#1 |