Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Takket

(21,529 posts)
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 10:05 PM Sep 2019

Is there an actual definition of "privileged" when it comes to the executive branch?

because it seems now that that word means "anything that could incriminate drumpf so I don't want to tell you." Another thread is on the bard about a whistle-blower claim being suppressed because it might be "privileged". Hope Hicks refused to even say what OFFICE she worked in.

How can a whistle-blower claim possibly be privileged? This implies a crime was committed, or at least a violation of established government policy, and I don't understand how either of those two things could be "privilged".

Or is all this just a matter of, "we'll do whatever the fuck we want, and have fun dragging it through the courts for a year if you ever want to know"

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is there an actual definition of "privileged" when it comes to the executive branch? (Original Post) Takket Sep 2019 OP
That's exactly what it is. It's a game of time. Claritie Pixie Sep 2019 #1

Claritie Pixie

(2,199 posts)
1. That's exactly what it is. It's a game of time.
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 10:17 PM
Sep 2019

Laws and departmental policies are ignored and they do what they want. They know legal challenges will slow things down to a snail's pace. They run out the clock through the election.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is there an actual defini...