Sat Sep 14, 2019, 03:20 AM
BigBearJohn (11,410 posts)
Trump's Acting National Security Adviser Said Nuclear War With USSR Was Winnable
Questioning “mutual assured destruction,” Charles Kupperman called nuclear conflict “in large part a physics problem.”
President Donald Trump’s acting national security adviser, former Reagan administration official Charles Kupperman, made an extraordinary and controversial claim in the early 1980s: nuclear conflict with the USSR was winnable and that “nuclear war is a destructive thing but still in large part a physics problem.” Kupperman’s suggestion that the U.S. could triumph in a nuclear war went against dominant theories of mutually assured destruction and ignored the long-term destabilizing effects that such hostilities would have on the planet’s health and global politics. Kupperman, appointed to his new post on Tuesday after Trump fired his John Bolton from the job, argued it was possible to win a nuclear war “in the classical sense,” and that the notion of total destruction stemming from such a superpower conflict was inaccurate. He said that in a scenario in which 20 million people died in the U.S. as opposed to 150 million, the nation could then emerge as the stronger side and prevail in its objectives. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/charles-kupperman-nuclear-war-trump-nsa_n_5d7b9809e4b03b5fc88212fd
|
6 replies, 583 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
BigBearJohn | Sep 2019 | OP |
Turbineguy | Sep 2019 | #1 | |
rampartc | Sep 2019 | #2 | |
Cosmocat | Sep 2019 | #3 | |
Cosmocat | Sep 2019 | #4 | |
SammyWinstonJack | Sep 2019 | #5 | |
DFW | Sep 2019 | #6 |
Response to BigBearJohn (Original post)
Sat Sep 14, 2019, 04:07 AM
Turbineguy (35,811 posts)
1. We must not allow.....
a mine shaft gap!
|
Response to BigBearJohn (Original post)
Sat Sep 14, 2019, 04:47 AM
rampartc (4,803 posts)
2. is he insane?
20 million casualties in a war (3 or 4 big cities) might be survivable, but winning?
20 million casualties might occur in an exchange with, oh, n korea or iran, but Russia or the ussr? maybe a few thousand or a million Alaskans and Navajo and a scattering of back woodsmen and preppers will not rebuild civilization from post apocalyptic destruction. |
Response to rampartc (Reply #2)
Sat Sep 14, 2019, 07:06 AM
Cosmocat (14,309 posts)
3. JHC
There are no limit to the depths ...
|
Response to BigBearJohn (Original post)
Sat Sep 14, 2019, 07:07 AM
Cosmocat (14,309 posts)
4. So somehow this genius found someone crazier
Than bolton ...
|
Response to Cosmocat (Reply #4)
Sat Sep 14, 2019, 07:57 AM
SammyWinstonJack (44,097 posts)
5. Yeah, shocker. WINNING!
![]() |
Response to BigBearJohn (Original post)
Sat Sep 14, 2019, 08:36 AM
DFW (50,517 posts)
6. Sure, let's have ONLY 20 million people die.
OK, so we lose the entire populations of Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Louisiana and Kentucky. Does that still sound so good?
Maybe I shouldn't ask. Take the entire populations of those states, add on the entire populations of Nebraska, Kansas, South Dakota, North Dakota and Wyoming, and borrow another 525,000 people from Oklahoma and you have an idea of how many Americans are still without any health care coverage. Keep in mind: THAT statistic doesn't seem to bother Republicans in the slightest. |