Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
Mon Sep 16, 2019, 02:49 PM Sep 2019

Bombing for the Saudis

It’s all super unclear, but the president’s public vow to bomb whoever Saudi Arabia tells us to is not reassuring. The Saudis are perfectly capable of fighting their own battles—we’ve sold them more than enough weaponry—but Trump’s stance throughout the crisis has been that, essentially, the U.S. military stands by to defend our favorite brutal authoritarian theocracy at any cost.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bombing for the Saudis (Original Post) G_j Sep 2019 OP
The U.S. military stands by to obey MBS's command gratuitous Sep 2019 #1
I would guess the attack was from Yemen or self-inflicted before thinking it was Iran. LonePirate Sep 2019 #2
Are the Saudis even technically allies? Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2019 #3
There is one flaw in your arguement.... Xolodno Sep 2019 #4
MBS is jealous that he called someone else Bettie Sep 2019 #5

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
1. The U.S. military stands by to obey MBS's command
Mon Sep 16, 2019, 02:57 PM
Sep 2019

Remember when conservatives were losing their shit over the prospect of U.S. military personnel taking orders from foreigners at NATO maneuvers? Never mind that this was nothing new, and U.S. military personnel have long worked with our allies, taking orders from foreign officers. Now, Trump explicitly says that our military is ready to go into action on MBS's say-so and nothing more. The next peep you hear from conservatives about that will be the first.

LonePirate

(13,407 posts)
2. I would guess the attack was from Yemen or self-inflicted before thinking it was Iran.
Mon Sep 16, 2019, 03:10 PM
Sep 2019

SA could eliminate or hamper a major competitor if the US engaged in a war with Iran. I do not trust any of the players in this mess.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,391 posts)
3. Are the Saudis even technically allies?
Mon Sep 16, 2019, 03:14 PM
Sep 2019

I mean, they still(?) fund schools that preach hatred of the US/West and almost all of the 9/11 hijackers were from SA. And do we want to go to bat for their unanswered for butchering of a journalist?

Xolodno

(6,383 posts)
4. There is one flaw in your arguement....
Mon Sep 16, 2019, 03:25 PM
Sep 2019

Yes, they have the equipment. But even with all that equipment, they are totally inept. The war in Yemen is a proxy war between them and Iran and the Saudi's are losing badly, this is with Iran having one arm tied behind its back. The Saudi military does not have the experience to fight a war, whereas Iran has battle hardened troops who've "volunteered" in wars both in Yemen and Syria.

Add to that, the most capable army in the Mid-East is Israel....and Iran is the one country they fear. Granted Israel would win...but at one hell of a cost.

Hence why, the Saudi's, Israel, etc. want us to fight their war for them, they would rather we absorb the cost in lives and money.

But I agree, let's stay the hell out of this like we did with Syria. The Saudi's created this mess, they can fix it themselves, and if they can't, then let them go home and lick their wounds. It might teach them something.

Bettie

(16,063 posts)
5. MBS is jealous that he called someone else
Mon Sep 16, 2019, 03:26 PM
Sep 2019

his favorite dictator, so he has to prove his love to him by killing a bunch of people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bombing for the Saudis