Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
Tue Sep 17, 2019, 06:37 PM Sep 2019

Billions spent on U.S. weapons didn't protect Saudi Arabia's most critical oil sites

For years, Saudi Arabia has been a major buyer of U.S.-made weapons. That relationship intensified after President Trump took office, with the American leader pushing oil-rich Riyadh to buy more weapons and Saudi Arabia pledging a purchase of $110 billion in U.S. arms just months after his inauguration.

After this weekend, when a devastating attack on Saudi oil facilities blindsided the kingdom, some observers were left wondering what protection Riyadh’s outreach to the United States has bought it. Notwithstanding the expensive military hardware purchased by Saudi Arabia, experts say, the Saturday attack represented an unusually well-planned operation that would have been difficult for even the most well-equipped and experienced countries to detect and neutralize.

“This was a really flawless attack,” said Michael Knights, a scholar at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy who has followed Saudi air defense for decades, adding that evidence suggests that only one of 20 missiles may have missed its target. “That’s astounding.”

The operation appeared to circumvent the defenses of Saudi Arabia’s military, including the six battalions of Patriot missile defense systems produced by U.S. defense contractor Raytheon — each of which can cost in the region of $1 billion.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/09/17/billions-spent-us-weapons-didnt-protect-saudi-arabias-most-critical-oil-sites-crippling-attack/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Kurt V.

(5,624 posts)
1. this was my point the day it happened. but we went down drone tech rabbit hole instead.
Tue Sep 17, 2019, 06:52 PM
Sep 2019

like any backyard tinkerer could pull this off.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
2. K&R, We are continuing to invest in Maginot devices that isn't going to help us in 10 - 20 years fro
Tue Sep 17, 2019, 06:53 PM
Sep 2019

... from now.

Brother Buzz

(36,416 posts)
4. I understand Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Northrop-Grumman....
Tue Sep 17, 2019, 07:21 PM
Sep 2019

are not returning telephone calls from a bunch of steamed Saudi princes.

House of Roberts

(5,168 posts)
5. I wonder if the Israeli Iron Dome system
Tue Sep 17, 2019, 07:26 PM
Sep 2019

would be more successful at detecting and intercepting this type of attack.

Not that the Kingdom would want anything around sporting a Star of David.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
7. The same will apply to our Carriers in the Persian Gulf.
Tue Sep 17, 2019, 07:39 PM
Sep 2019

The last simulation done years ago showed Iran could overwhelm our defenses with enough simultaneous missile and torpedo attacks. I read an article on it a while back.

The results were hidden at the time. I could not find the article but did not look too hard.

Dozens of missiles launched TOT would be hard to shoot down.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Billions spent on U.S. we...