If Iran Denies Having Anything To Do With The SA Attacks Why Don't They.....

[global1]

provide evidence as to who is responsible for the attacks?

[33taw]

1. Do we know they have evidence of who did it?

[global1]

15. No - We Don't Know If They Have Evidence Of Who Did It But....

they are in the area and they may have some sort of surveillance system that might suggest who did do it.

[5X]

2. so, i didn't rob the bank but i have to prove it?

[malaise]

4. No - more than that you have to prove who did

That is some twisted logic

[malaise]

3. Huh? n/t

[atreides1]

5. Well

So far the Japanese and the French have said they've seen no evidence that Iran launched the attack! And with the American intelligence agencies already politicized, along with most agencies in this administration...I'm not taking anything they report as being the truth!!!

[Baked Potato]

6. Truth isn't relevant anymore

It’s all about what people *believe*.

[customerserviceguy]

7. They're lying sacks of Shiites n/t

[marble falls]

10. Seriously? Bigotry is funny?

[customerserviceguy]

11. Bigotry is not funny

but puns are.

Who do you think had the means and the motive to do this? The Iranian mullahs and their puppet government have been a cancer on the world for over four decades now.

[Act_of_Reparation]

8. A better question is why they bother denying it all.

Iran supports Houthi rebels ostensibly at war with Saudi Arabia. Whoever carried out the attack is very likely tied to Iran, however indirectly.

[marble falls]

9. Why should they have to provide evidence in an incident that happened in Saudi Arabia?

[global1]

14. If They Are Being Unjustly Accused Of This Attack.....

and they may have evidence as to who was behind the attack - shouldn't they try and clear their name and avoid some military confrontation?

[marble falls]

20. How would they be in possesion of any evidence at all? Why not ask Poland ...

for evidence of who did it. Even the Saudis say they don't know Iran had anything to do with it.

I think American oil producers did it to jack prices up. Lets ask Mauritania to produce evidence.

[Bettie]

12. Maybe because they know they didn't do it

but they don't know who did.

If I didn't rob the bank, it isn't on me to figure out or know who did it.

[GeorgeGist]

13. You know the US has geostationary spy satellites over mideast ...

so they must have pictures.

[rurallib]

16. How or why would Iran have any evidence to provide?

I believe the burden of proof for providing evidence belongs to those making the accusation. Isn't that the way this is supposed to work?

[global1]

17. Again - Iran Being In The Area - They Might Have Some Surviellance Info As To Where The Attack Came.

from or who might have done the attack.

Even though the burden of proof for providing evidence belongs to those making the accusation - if you were innocent of something someone accused you of - and you had some sort of evidence that you didn't do it - wouldn't you want to provide proof of your innocence.

Would you risk a military confrontation if you were innocent?

[rurallib]

18. IF I had the evidence sure. But that is a very big if

My next door neighbor shot himself one night after threatening his wife. I was in the area, but I had no evidence nor idea what he was doing.

[33taw]

19. Who stands to benefit from the attack?

[PufPuf23]

21. Your logic is off and questions like yours are essentially war mongering that

enables the neo-con and neo-liberal war hawks.

France and Japan do not believe that Iran did the attack (and there must be some basis). Anything that Iran says or does in response is going to be twisted. We are responsible for allowing untrustworthy MSM and government in or country and believing them wholesale.

How can you (or anyone of sound mind) believe what the USA government or military says about such matters? Look at the lies and propaganda and total BS (Kuwaiti incubators, mobile chemical weapons labs, UBL's fortress of solitude at Tora Bora, etc.) that brought us into the various ME wars. We are the aggressor against Iran, Saudi is the aggressor against the Houthis in Yemen. We practiced aggressive war against Iraq, Libya, and Syria and abet the Saudis in their own war of aggression in Yemen.

[global1]

23. I Don't Follow Your Logic That A Quesion Like Mine Is War Mongering.....

I'm just saying if Iran has evidence that they didn't do the bombing and know who did - why don't they provide it to prove their innocence. Why is that 'war mongering'?

[ret5hd]

27. I think you need to ask for a raise.

[PufPuf23]

30. More like remedial logic.

That sort of logic is why we are so fucked up (as many posters in this thread seem to understand).

[TheRealNorth]

29. Their logic is pretty ironclad

If you can't follow the logic, that's on you.

[former9thward]

33. You are twisting what France and Japan have said.

They have said they have seen no evidence that Iran did the attack. That is completely different than saying Iran did not do it which you posted. I am suspicious of the statements of any country dependent on Iranian oil or the oil from Iran's main alley, Russia.

[Autumn]

22. Disputing Trump claims, Japan says no evidence Iran was behind Saudi attack

“We are not aware of any information that points to Iran,” said Japanese defense minister Taro Kono.

Japanese Defense Minister Taro Kono told reporters Wednesday that he has not seen any intelligence indicating Iran was behind the attacks on Saudi Arabian oil facilities over the weekend, contradicting Saudi and Trump administration claims about the incident.

“We are not aware of any information that points to Iran,” Kono said during a press briefing. “We believe the Houthis carried out the attack based on the statement claiming responsibility.”

The only evidence the Trump administration has released to substantiate its claim of Iranian responsibility are satellite photos that experts said are not clear enough to assign blame. Ret. Gen. Mark Hertling, a CNN intelligence analyst, said the images “really don’t show anything, other than pretty good accuracy on the strike of the oil tanks.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/09/disputing-trump-claims-japan-says-no-evidence-iran-was-behind-saudi-attack/

[EX500rider]

25. I doubt Japan has many intelligence assets in the Persian Gulf so not surprising.

I doubt the the island nation of Tonga has any proof either.

[Autumn]

32. They might not, but I trust them over the Orange Ass. Any day of the week. nt

[former9thward]

34. You can trust a country dependent on Iranian oil.

And a country dependent on Russian oil, Iran's main ally. I don't.

[onethatcares]

24. dammint,

we supposedly have ultra secret military ability to read license plates from a gazillion miles in the sky. Wouldn't we have some type of Ring doorbell that would video tape 3 cruize missles and some drones in real time?

I call bullshit on this one. donnie needs a war,

[FBaggins]

26. Time to attack Iceland!

They might SAY that they had nothing to do with the attack... but they refuse to tell us who did!

[Haggis for Breakfast]

28. Well, IF they SAID they didn't do it, then we should take them at their word

and believe them.

After all, we are supposed to believe that Putin didn't interfere with our elections, because he SAID he didn't do so. Kim Jong Un SAID that he didn't torture Otto Warmbier to death, so he didn't. MBS SAID that he didn't order the execution of Jamal Khashoggi, so he didn't do that either.

By the example set by our peerless leader, he accepts - at face value - that none of these men did anything that they are accused of because they SAID they didn't do those things, and we should believe them, because (gasp) those men would NEVER lie to us.

[Blue_true]

31. Whuuuut????????? So, I didn't eat the donut, but I must find out who did? nt