General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho should chair, if formed, a House Select Committee...
...to investigate & move forward with impeachment proceedings against the President.
madaboutharry
(40,210 posts)He doesn't take any crap from anyone. He is my choice.
Atticus
(15,124 posts)Agree!
maxsolomon
(33,338 posts)Professional, calm demeanor. Cogent questioner, has command of the minutiae.
I don't know of anyone else I'd trust to lay out a compelling case to the public while Trump et al are screaming at the top of their lungs.
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)He would be the best choice IMHO.
madaboutharry
(40,210 posts)Schiff would do a great job.
Atticus
(15,124 posts)chair assignment will be a gruelling one, mentally and physically. He should definitely be ON the committee, but without the burden of the chairmanship. Thanks for your response.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)...but I'd prefer Schiff. Or, Katie Porter!! She takes no shits from anyone!
avebury
(10,952 posts)the fact that a woman would be up front and center in nailing Trump which he would hate.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)I think Schiff or Nadler would be great.
I miss Stephanie Tubbs Jones - she would have been perfect
avebury
(10,952 posts)I wasn't overly impress with Nadler in the Lewandowski hearing. Schiff is very measured in what he says and would offer the gravitas that the hearing would need.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Schiff would be excellent.
I do wonder if they would name the current chair of a critical committee to chair this panel giving the responsibility and workload he already has. They may come up with someone we haven't even thought of who doesn't already chair a major committee.
The speculation is fun, though, isn't it?
bdamomma
(63,849 posts)oh my, she would nailed their asses.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)Captain Zero
(6,805 posts)has to be someone on the intel committee, for sure.
avebury
(10,952 posts)well thought of by everyone that when Trump tries to go after him/her it will backfire on Trump bigly.
ETA - The Democrats need to make Trump so toxic in the impeachment hearing that it would be lethal to any Rethug Senators that try to protect Trump.
kentuck
(111,094 posts)Which disqualifies many.
SlogginThroughIt
(1,977 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,590 posts)bdamomma
(63,849 posts)she would be good too.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)Swallwell would be a good choice as well.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Grasswire2
(13,569 posts)CrispyQ
(36,464 posts)WaPo columnist Jennifer Rubin: It was chaos then a real lawyer showed up
The real excitement came, however, after the media decided it was all chaos and Democrats had accomplished nothing. Democrats counsel Barry Berke got 30 minutes to question Lewandowski and made the most of it.
Sorry WaPo is a paywall. It's an excellent commentary. She lays out what Berke got on record with Lewandowski.
Triloon
(506 posts)BigMin28
(1,176 posts)Remember this?
sdfernando
(4,935 posts)Obama chair it. LOL!
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)Throughout he has been no-nonsense and is a great questioner of witnesses. Nadler should get consideration also as he has been pushing for impeachment for awhile and I don't think a select committee would devolve into the kind of GOP clown show he's had to deal with on Judiciary.