Trump's Impeachment and the Era of No Accountability
By the end of this year, Donald Trump will become the third U.S. president to be impeached by the House of Representatives and not convicted by the Senate. Depending on your perspective, you may see that as a constitutional design flaw or something that ultimately puts the electorate in charge of determining the political leadership. Impeachment was always a last-resort remedy reserved for the gravest abuses of power. It worked in 1974 when the parties were not as ideologically sorted, but has been rendered ineffective today.
So why impeach? Well, that one is simple: The question has shifted from Donald Trump’s conduct to the credibility and viability of Congress itself. The most recent impeachment trigger, Trump’s bullying of a smaller country desperate for foreign aid to get them to assist in a political hit job on a chief rival, is certainly worthy of the threshold of high crimes or misdemeanors. But it’s no greater abuse than a host of other activities, from obstruction of justice to using the Justice Department’s antitrust laws to attack corporate foes.
The tipping point did not happen on a phone call to the president of Ukraine in July, but in a series of town hall meetings with frontline Democratic House members (the ones most vulnerable for re-election) in August. Members like Abigail Spanberger came into the month thinking they had threaded the needle and heeded the wishes of their moderate constituents. The frontliners’ theory was that the threat to their futures lay with the Squad, and radicalism to their left. It turns out the people were with the radicals on what mattered most—holding lawlessness accountable. The biggest threat to the moderates, in other words, was inaction.
Here’s the best way of putting it: Trump is Wells Fargo.
The big bank was among those who contributed to the near implosion of the entire U.S. economy in 2008, and despite that, none of its top executives were held accountable. And Wells Fargo, consciously or unconsciously, got the message that they could continue their practices with relative impunity. And they did. They signed up customers to fake accounts, falsified records in mortgage cases, charged people for junk auto insurance they didn’t ask for, and even charged overdraft fees on accounts that were closed.
Read more: https://prospect.org/power/trump-impeachment-era-of-no-accountability/
(American Prospect)
= new reply since forum marked as read
1) Conspiracy to defraud the United States (using taxpayers money as leverage to commit Electoral-Law fraud)
2) Obstruction of Justice (8 counts or more as detailed in Volume 2 of the Mueller Report)
3) Obstruction of Congress (how many counts yet?)
4) Witness tampering (many occurences on Twitter)
5) Bank-, Tax-, Insurance-related fraud (Ways and Means Committee Re: Tax Returns)
6) Money laundering (how many counts from Deutsche Bank docs?)
7) Individual 1...
Maybe they won't ignore their hypocritical Law-And-Order-Party 'campaign slogan' 
