Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RDANGELO

(3,432 posts)
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 02:08 AM Sep 2019

We know from Fox News how the Republicans are going to approach this.

According to an article in Fox News, the inspector general has determined that the whistle blower was biased and a supporter of an opposing candidate, and that after talking to the DOJ he was persuaded that it did not meet the legal definition of urgent - whatever the heck that means. There is no way that the Democrats would be acting the way they are if the IG had backed out and decided it wasn't urgent.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dweller

(23,612 posts)
1. obscurification
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 02:12 AM
Sep 2019

and bullshittery abounds ..

be ready for it,
buckle up and be proud to be a Democrat

✌🏼

RDANGELO

(3,432 posts)
6. I'm not saying that we know what he is going to say, but whatever it is, it going to come from his
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 02:32 AM
Sep 2019

mouth. I doubt that he will say that he is backing out from the complaint.

lark

(23,061 posts)
10. No, he will say he's not allowed to say anything per the attorneys for Barr/drumpf.
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 09:28 AM
Sep 2019

He will give out zero information - zero is what I expect. He's & Barr are partners in the cover up and will never divulge anything.

Kablooie

(18,605 posts)
9. I wish. They've never been able to rip anything to sheds before
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 02:48 AM
Sep 2019

And I don't expect that to change.
He will lie and refuse to talk, they will warn him and that will be that.

Only if they either arrest him or fine him thousands each day will they get any results.

stopbush

(24,392 posts)
3. Except that the DNI has no legal standing to make such a determination.
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 02:13 AM
Sep 2019

Last edited Wed Sep 25, 2019, 03:12 PM - Edit history (1)

Just like Lewandowski had no right to assert executive privilege.

Beartracks

(12,797 posts)
4. Let's say I stand for decency, moral values, and the rule of law.
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 02:17 AM
Sep 2019

By definition, I would:

a) blow the whistle on criminal, treasonous, or unconstitutional conduct of the President; and
b) not support him in his re-election bid because of said conduct, preferring to support some other candidate who better embodies my priorities and values.

Ergo, if I'm a whistleblower on a treasonous politician, of course I'm a "supporter of an opposing candidate." Duh.

=========

madville

(7,404 posts)
7. Not sure, but this could be a trap
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 02:44 AM
Sep 2019

Right after Pelosi announces an impeachment inquiry Trump says "release the transcript tomorrow". Something doesn't feel right.....we'll see.

Kablooie

(18,605 posts)
8. So only Trump Toadies can criticise him.
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 02:44 AM
Sep 2019

Anyone who doesn't like Trump is biased and can't have a valid complaint.
Uh huh.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We know from Fox News how...