General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNot Buying THIS Again -Trump Admin Prepares REDACTED VERSION Of Whistleblower Complaint For Congress
The Trump administration is preparing to release a redacted version of the DNI whistleblower complaint to Congress to quash the growing calls for President Donald Trumps impeachment, and to assuage lawmakers angry at the blatant disregard for oversight law.
According to the New York Times, Trump called House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) Tuesday to convince her that he personally wasnt responsible for blocking the DNI whistleblowers complaint from Congress in the first place.
He reportedly thinks that the optics of the administration blocking the information from Congress are ultimately worse for him than the content of those documents. In the same vein, they plan to release an unclassified and unredacted transcript of the late July call he had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday.
However, according to Reuters, the transcript of the call is unlikely to be verbatim and will not be accompanied by a recording. Instead, the ultimate document will more likely be notes on the phone call taken by officers on assignment at the National Security Council. Those note-takers are reportedly unlikely to include details that would be embarrassing for their nations leader, should the document leak.
MORE:
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-administration-whistleblower-complaint-congress-ukraine
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-whistleblower-transcript-idUSKBN1W935S
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
CincyDem
(6,356 posts)Where have I heard that before...
calimary
(81,238 posts)dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)sinking feeling, the confusion, even the anchors seemed to be feeling the same thing. After a year of anticipation it felt like such a letdown. They blew any credibility they had in that moment. AG Barr would be smart to keep his big head out of it this time.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)tamper with evidence?
spanone
(135,831 posts)So, WHO is going to redact it?
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Volaris
(10,270 posts)If so, let him release whatever the fuck he wants, and when it isn't accurate to the facts, throw in an obstruction charge...
mitch96
(13,895 posts)Yea....... that ain't gonna work...
m