Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
122 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*************Whistle-blower Hearing THREAD 2******************** (Original Post) bdamomma Sep 2019 OP
Was reading some of the comments in the local newspaper TheRealNorth Sep 2019 #1
they don't like facts bdamomma Sep 2019 #3
Between Greta and this they are unraveling ... live love laugh Sep 2019 #17
Mike Conaway (R) now. Mike 03 Sep 2019 #2
Conway was relatively reasonable unc70 Sep 2019 #6
He was actually reasonable BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #7
So far, Nunes and Conaway (Repukes) seem more concerned with how this looks in the media Roland99 Sep 2019 #4
Nunes is pond scum. WinstonSmith4740 Sep 2019 #64
Whole bot farms have been unleashed on Twitter. dewsgirl Sep 2019 #5
Oh geez. BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #13
The Orange Man tweets... thecrow Sep 2019 #14
Yeah, but they were too busy beating up the little kids. dhol82 Sep 2019 #19
When I went to vote in 2016, there was a group of men in their early 30's in the parking lot redstatebluegirl Sep 2019 #57
This RAB910 Sep 2019 #8
..... BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #18
and will MurrayDelph Sep 2019 #95
Yup! BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #100
Looks like our "acting" DNI Corgigal Sep 2019 #9
👍🏼 uponit7771 Sep 2019 #28
Good phrasing Corgigal! MaryMagdaline Sep 2019 #83
Thanks for the updates happy feet Sep 2019 #10
From what I'm hearing, the main tactic bots and Trump allies OliverQ Sep 2019 #11
Terri Sewell (D-AL) now Mike 03 Sep 2019 #12
He? Freethinker65 Sep 2019 #20
Nunez is such a treasonous ass Takket Sep 2019 #15
"They" meaning trump. kacekwl Sep 2019 #44
Michael Turner (R) now Mike 03 Sep 2019 #16
Again bdamomma Sep 2019 #21
That is exactly what he did. I hope schiff calls him out still_one Sep 2019 #22
Michael Turner speechifies. Mike 03 Sep 2019 #23
Executive privilege, executive privilege, executive privilege........................ SamKnause Sep 2019 #24
Schiff just nailed Turner (R) on not detecting parody in his opening statement Roland99 Sep 2019 #25
The parody mia Sep 2019 #41
Maquire what a liar bdamomma Sep 2019 #26
Andre Carson (D) now. Mike 03 Sep 2019 #27
So...now the FBI had it third Backseat Driver Sep 2019 #39
Maquire bdamomma Sep 2019 #29
Schiff intervenes Mike 03 Sep 2019 #30
it's a Repig questioning bdamomma Sep 2019 #31
Wenstrup (R) is all a twitter and flustered about the parody portion of Schiff's opening statement Roland99 Sep 2019 #32
I really don't care for bdamomma Sep 2019 #33
Is Wenstrup chewing gum? shanti Sep 2019 #34
dunno..but the guy behind him certainly seems to be! Roland99 Sep 2019 #35
Wenstrup (R) Mike 03 Sep 2019 #36
Jackie Speier up. BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #37
Jackie Speier (D) now. Mike 03 Sep 2019 #38
Finally getting into details of the call. Speier asking about... Roland99 Sep 2019 #40
Maguire stating the whistleblower got the information secondhand Roland99 Sep 2019 #42
WILL SOMEONE PLEASE ASK THIS : Mike Niendorff Sep 2019 #43
What is the point of asking questions about whether the Whistleblower is honest? brooklynite Sep 2019 #45
Speier is getting into the nuts and bolts of the complaint Mike 03 Sep 2019 #46
This is How Democrats should question a Witness.... LovingA2andMI Sep 2019 #47
ROFL. Stewart: I'm not gonna treat you like a child and cut you off... MrsCoffee Sep 2019 #48
Chris Stewart (R) up now. Mike 03 Sep 2019 #49
Stewart (R) fawning over his own military service Roland99 Sep 2019 #50
FYI - Seth Abramson on bs Executive Privilege claim... Roland99 Sep 2019 #52
Of course, only Dumpy can insult our military veterans flibbitygiblets Sep 2019 #98
The GOP is asking no actual questions. "Are you a good guy? Is this political?" nolabear Sep 2019 #51
Again, a Repuke, Stewart, worried about leaks Roland99 Sep 2019 #53
face of the Rethugs Celerity Sep 2019 #54
I know fat shaming is wrong. But, I couldn't not look at him. Funtatlaguy Sep 2019 #58
Looks like the guy from the infamous Monty Python skit grantcart Sep 2019 #114
Or what about this guy from Austin Powers. Funtatlaguy Sep 2019 #121
That's a Massive Heart Attack... LovingA2andMI Sep 2019 #70
Just a wafer-thin mint Mr. Creosote.... OneBlueDotBama Sep 2019 #76
Chris Stewart (R) Mike 03 Sep 2019 #55
Mike Quigley (D) up Mike 03 Sep 2019 #56
Quigley brought up Ghouliani!!! BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #59
I am stepping away bdamomma Sep 2019 #60
Gonna depend on you folks to keep me updated. WinstonSmith4740 Sep 2019 #61
Quigley asks about Giuliani's role. Mike 03 Sep 2019 #62
Quigley still on Giuliani Mike 03 Sep 2019 #63
Elise Stefanik (R) now Mike 03 Sep 2019 #65
When I heard last night that they weren't present underpants Sep 2019 #68
Swalwell, excellent BeyondGeography Sep 2019 #66
Swalwell knocking it out of the park. He's not putting up oasis Sep 2019 #72
Total bulldog; that's how you make the most of your time BeyondGeography Sep 2019 #74
He NAILED it on the mandatory requirement Roland99 Sep 2019 #81
THIS IS HUGE! Thanks for the link. oasis Sep 2019 #120
Eric Swalwell now (D) Mike 03 Sep 2019 #67
Swalwell was good. SharonClark Sep 2019 #82
Will Hurd (R-TX) now Mike 03 Sep 2019 #69
Notice that Hurd kept saying "Good Copy. Good Copy" amb123 Sep 2019 #84
MaGuire: I think the greatest challenge we face is not a nuclear strike from Iran or Russia Mike 03 Sep 2019 #71
Joaquin Castro (D) now Mike 03 Sep 2019 #73
He did great. Now Ratcliffe is loving on Maquire and denigrating the whistle blower. SharonClark Sep 2019 #77
ADNI logic is 100% faulty, he doesn't get to rob a bank cause he's confused about the law about ... uponit7771 Sep 2019 #75
Did this Repuke just say "dumocrats"? Roland99 Sep 2019 #78
Ding ding ding, GOPer just said Steele Dossier bigbrother05 Sep 2019 #79
Wtf does that have to do with this?? Roland99 Sep 2019 #80
its for fox "news" mikeysnot Sep 2019 #87
Rep Denny Heck was good SharonClark Sep 2019 #85
Peter Welch up now. SharonClark Sep 2019 #86
Sean Patrick Maloney up now SharonClark Sep 2019 #89
Val Demings up now. SharonClark Sep 2019 #90
Maguire will NOT answer as to whether he spoke to the president about this complaint Roland99 Sep 2019 #88
MY Congresswoman! Go, Val, Go! Roland99 Sep 2019 #91
Now she's leveling the boom...the US coercing Ukraine since Ukraine is so dependent upon the US Roland99 Sep 2019 #92
He sure did. SharonClark Sep 2019 #93
Raja Krishnamoorthi up now SharonClark Sep 2019 #94
Nunes grandstanding saying the House needs to hold a vote on the floor if they want to impeach Roland99 Sep 2019 #96
With Schiff, every question is a like a scalpel. Mike 03 Sep 2019 #97
This is going nowhere! FarPoint Sep 2019 #99
Schiff is killing this fool budkin Sep 2019 #101
Maguire REALLY is not very bright. Schiff is amazing. Nt spooky3 Sep 2019 #102
This guy is not qualified to be DNI. Jim__ Sep 2019 #103
Abso.fuckin.lutely!! Duppers Sep 2019 #107
Boy, Schiff has got him on the ropes. He seems confused. nolabear Sep 2019 #104
Schiff is indeed methodically backing him into the corner Brother Buzz Sep 2019 #111
Some questions need to be presented as requiring YES or NO responses only. ecstatic Sep 2019 #105
If there was not a claim of executive privilege within 7 days..... TheRealNorth Sep 2019 #106
Apparently it DNI doesn't think anything is a threat to the country. dem4decades Sep 2019 #108
Heinlein's razor Nasruddin Sep 2019 #116
He may have been a good guy but Trump has corrupted him. Another one bites the dust. dem4decades Sep 2019 #122
Schiff's second round of questions Mike 03 Sep 2019 #109
"I know nothink!" (Hogan's Heroes) I think Schiff's objective, if he couldn't get spooky3 Sep 2019 #118
Love Schiff. He won't back off, keeps the pressure on. SaveOurDemocracy Sep 2019 #110
Schiff bringing up Ghouliani, Pence flibbitygiblets Sep 2019 #112
Schiff asks about Giuliani's involvement. Mike 03 Sep 2019 #113
***ADJOURNED**** BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #115
Now Schiff is apologizing to the people of Ukraine, pledging our support flibbitygiblets Sep 2019 #117
A friend told me.... JPK Sep 2019 #119

TheRealNorth

(9,478 posts)
1. Was reading some of the comments in the local newspaper
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:16 AM
Sep 2019

Hold onto your hats, the MAGATS are getting deranged and nasty.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
2. Mike Conaway (R) now.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:17 AM
Sep 2019

Soft questioning. He's apologizing to the witness if he feels his honor has been questioned.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
4. So far, Nunes and Conaway (Repukes) seem more concerned with how this looks in the media
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:18 AM
Sep 2019

than how the laws were violated.

Nunes was really concerned about leaks that made the admin look bad.

WinstonSmith4740

(3,056 posts)
64. Nunes is pond scum.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:02 AM
Sep 2019

Trump's errand boy has a lot of fucking nerve trying to cast aspersions (or asparagus) on anyone's ethics.

thecrow

(5,519 posts)
14. The Orange Man tweets...
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:23 AM
Sep 2019

“Is their a case for impeachment? Absolutely not!” There is no high crimes or misdemeanors, no treason, no extortion, no treason.” RD Robert Ray, respected


Didn’t these people go to grammar school ?

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
57. When I went to vote in 2016, there was a group of men in their early 30's in the parking lot
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:56 AM
Sep 2019

in MAGA hats. Eventually someone came out and told them to remove the hats or leave the parking lot. They were not the sharpest knives in the drawer, got into old beat up pickups with gun racks in the back. That is when I knew what we were dealing with in terms of the deplorables.

Corgigal

(9,291 posts)
9. Looks like our "acting" DNI
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:20 AM
Sep 2019

was our governments catch and kill AMI person. Worked so well for AMI, guess some fool will accept that job. Crazy.

 

OliverQ

(3,363 posts)
11. From what I'm hearing, the main tactic bots and Trump allies
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:20 AM
Sep 2019

are using is focusing on the "I did not have first hand accounts" part, so they're saying this isn't evidence, it's just hearsay.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
12. Terri Sewell (D-AL) now
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:21 AM
Sep 2019

Questioning focuses on the chilling effect how this has been handled will have on future whistleblowers.

MaGuire strongly defends whistleblowers.

Sewell: WHen this president called the whistleblower a political hack you remained silent... Can you confirm you have assured this whistleblower can come before congress?

MaGuire: I don't know the identity of the whistleblower...

Sewell: Can you assure us the whistleblower is authorized to speak to us and has full protections.

MaGuire: To the best of my ability I am. I think he can come forward. I'll do everything I can to endeavor to support it.

Takket

(21,563 posts)
15. Nunez is such a treasonous ass
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:24 AM
Sep 2019

Warned him to be careful what he says because they will “use it against you”. Trying to taint the testimony before it even starts.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
16. Michael Turner (R) now
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:25 AM
Sep 2019

He admits what is described in the transcript is "not okay".

He's going to say it's not as bad as Schiff made it sound. He's going to lie about the contents of the complaint and downplay it and accuse Schiff of exaggerating the importance.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
23. Michael Turner speechifies.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:28 AM
Sep 2019

Deep state stuff. Accusing the intelligence agencies of "abuse of surveillance."

He's shifting the focus and expressing doubts about the intentions of the intelligence community.

MaGuire is handling it pretty well. He's explaining how high the standards are for a whistleblower complaint to rise to this level. It can't be just any complaint at any level. It has to be critical and of urgent concern to get this far.

SamKnause

(13,101 posts)
24. Executive privilege, executive privilege, executive privilege........................
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:30 AM
Sep 2019

I am so sick of these people exercising executive privilege to cover for the orange anus.

Stating whether you have spoken to the president about a certain issue should not be

covered by executive privilege.

Giving details about the conversation may well be covered.

mia

(8,360 posts)
41. The parody
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:45 AM
Sep 2019

was unnecessary and could become the focus of more accusations of fake news leading the narrative. I wish Nunes hadn't done this.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
27. Andre Carson (D) now.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:33 AM
Sep 2019

Carson: This is unprecedented. Do you know why it's unprecedented? It couldn't be clearer... You SHALL forward this to the Intel committee with in seven days... Isn't that right sir?

MaGuire: Yes but this one is different because it didn't meet all the criteria. (the whistleblower not being in the intelligence chain?)

Carson is upset it was withheld and his questioning so far focuses on that.

MaGuire: THe White House and Office of Legal Counsel did NOT urge me to withhold this complaint... It was referred to the FBI for further investigation (during the 7 day waiting period). We were not stonewalling, just complying with the law the way it is written.

Backseat Driver

(4,390 posts)
39. So...now the FBI had it third
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:44 AM
Sep 2019

"shall" to Congress? Clear stonewalling - there is no executive privilege for committing a crime, regardless of the opinion that sitting POTUS might, in this case, did, though cannot be indicted! Impeachment alone IS the remedy and needs be "shall" be submitted without intervening submission to the perp's branch, to Legal, nor to Intelligence for evaluation -

bdamomma

(63,840 posts)
29. Maquire
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:37 AM
Sep 2019

is upholding the tRump loyal creed, don't go to Congress period, and don't give them information. Schiff get the hook.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
30. Schiff intervenes
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:37 AM
Sep 2019

Schiff: Since you were not urged to withhold the complaint from us by the WH, you exercised your own discretion and failed to provide it to us?? Providing the document is the unbroken tradition, are you aware of that? We're talking about Urgent Concern here... The past practice has always been to provide it to this committee.

M: I admit this has never happened it before, this is a unique situation, unprecedented...

Schiff: You made the decision to withhold it for a month when the WH made no claim of executive privilege or asked you otherwise to not provide it.

M: It was referred to the FBI for investigation. I could not forward it to you without the issue of executive privilege being addressed. It took longer than I would have liked, that's for sure... When there was no longer an issue of executive privilege I was free to give it to you. There was no (bad faith) involved.



bdamomma

(63,840 posts)
31. it's a Repig questioning
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:38 AM
Sep 2019

they always down play the truth and facts. Fictional my ass. I will not listen to this jerk.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
32. Wenstrup (R) is all a twitter and flustered about the parody portion of Schiff's opening statement
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:39 AM
Sep 2019

again, worried about the optics of how it plays in the media.

bdamomma

(63,840 posts)
33. I really don't care for
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:41 AM
Sep 2019

how repigs downplay the truth and facts and if they (repigs) imply that the american people do not care I will do this.



Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
36. Wenstrup (R)
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:42 AM
Sep 2019

He's slightly feisty.

Focussing on the president's latitude to conduct foreign affairs. He needs flexibility to negotiate. He's throwing shade on Obama. Now we're back to executive privilege. The president has a right to withhold his communications from congress.

Wenstrup's core argument is that such communications should be privileged. And MaGuire's doing a poor job of explaining how this situation is different.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
40. Finally getting into details of the call. Speier asking about...
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:45 AM
Sep 2019

why the call transcripts/recordings were moved.

Maguire initially demurring...

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
42. Maguire stating the whistleblower got the information secondhand
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:45 AM
Sep 2019

Speier interjecting that the ICIG report deemed the complaint credible

Mike Niendorff

(3,460 posts)
43. WILL SOMEONE PLEASE ASK THIS :
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:45 AM
Sep 2019

"Does executive privilege cover criminal activity? Can the executive branch assert executive privilege to silence a witness to a crime?"

Because that is -- specifically -- what is at issue here.


MDN

brooklynite

(94,508 posts)
45. What is the point of asking questions about whether the Whistleblower is honest?
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:47 AM
Sep 2019

The issue here is the specific charges.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
46. Speier is getting into the nuts and bolts of the complaint
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:47 AM
Sep 2019

She's asking about the repository where the communications were stowed when WH officials realized they were unethical and problematic.

Maguire reminds her the whistleblower didn't have first hand knowledge.

Speier: Do you believe the whistleblower was spying on this president?
Maguire: No and he complied with the law...
Speier: WHy didn't you defend him...
Maguire: I was just trying to follow the law.
Speier: Do you believe the whistleblower is on our side (a patriot) or against us?

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
47. This is How Democrats should question a Witness....
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:48 AM
Sep 2019

Great Job So Far. Thank You U.S. House Intelligence Committee!

MrsCoffee

(5,801 posts)
48. ROFL. Stewart: I'm not gonna treat you like a child and cut you off...
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:49 AM
Sep 2019

And instantly cuts him off his first answer. And then tried to cut him off his second answer.

I love it.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
49. Chris Stewart (R) up now.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:50 AM
Sep 2019

He's defending MaGuire against insinuations against his honorable character.

Not sure, it sounds like he's attacking other Republicans who have accused him of partisanship.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
50. Stewart (R) fawning over his own military service
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:50 AM
Sep 2019

Saying it’s horrible for anyone who hasn’t served to impugn Maguire’s honor

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
52. FYI - Seth Abramson on bs Executive Privilege claim...
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:50 AM
Sep 2019




Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson
No.

Not when the DNI had prima facie criminal evidence; not when privilege resided in the complaint's subject; not when the statute is mandatory; not when the ICIG had ruled the whistleblower compliant; not when privilege wasn't raised; not when even DOJ gave the DNI discretion.

flibbitygiblets

(7,220 posts)
98. Of course, only Dumpy can insult our military veterans
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:00 PM
Sep 2019

Because he's One Of Us. Or some such horeseshit.

nolabear

(41,959 posts)
51. The GOP is asking no actual questions. "Are you a good guy? Is this political?"
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:50 AM
Sep 2019

FFS, can they actually talk about the complaint?

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
55. Chris Stewart (R)
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:54 AM
Sep 2019

Now he's attacking whoever leaked this information to the press. He's asking MaGuire to investigate the leaks or suggesting he should.

"Good luck convincing the American people that this is a dishonorable man."

I don't know who he's attacking? Oh, it might be the Democrats. Adam Schiff responds.

(I thought the Republicans were attacking MaGuire!)

WHenever Adam Schiff responds, it settles the matter. He knows how to whack these moles.

WinstonSmith4740

(3,056 posts)
61. Gonna depend on you folks to keep me updated.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:57 AM
Sep 2019

I tried watching. Really. If I keep watching, I'm going to end up destroying my TV by throwing stuff at it.

I used to be able to watch these things...Republicans are flat out infuriating.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
62. Quigley asks about Giuliani's role.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 10:58 AM
Sep 2019

MaGuire stifles a laugh and says he can't get into particulars.

"I know what the allegations are. I'm not saying whether the allegations are true."

Quigley wants to dig down on Giuliani. Doubt he'll get very far on this.

But good for him for trying!

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
63. Quigley still on Giuliani
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:00 AM
Sep 2019

MaGuire: I only know what I've read in the complaint.

Quigley reads from the complaint. "Your reaction to that."

M: Ask the white house about that. I have no authority or responsibility over the white house.

Q: This complaint doesn't concern you??

M: There's a lot that concerns me. I'm the DNI. How the president wants to conduct diplomacy is his business, it's not about whether I approve or disapprove.

M didn't want to touch the Giuliani line of questioning. But he really did laugh the moment the name came up.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
65. Elise Stefanik (R) now
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:03 AM
Sep 2019

She's going to emphasize that the whistleblower was not a direct witness to events. "THis seems to me to be important."

MaGuire defends the IG. He did exactly what his job is. "I do know that michael atkinson did in fact discuss this with the whistleblower and found him to be credible" He may well have spoken to others, I'm just not aware.

underpants

(182,785 posts)
68. When I heard last night that they weren't present
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:09 AM
Sep 2019

My wife and I both rolled our eyes. I’ve read the complaint this morning- they corroborated with a lot of people who were there or know of what happened

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
67. Eric Swalwell now (D)
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:08 AM
Sep 2019

He's interested, again, in why MaGuire took the complaint to the white house and DOJ.

Maguire: We consulted and decided to go to the office of legal counsel.

Swalwell is arguing that this became an intelligence issue when the communications were moved into the secret intelligence system database. (Good argument).

So he's arguing that this complaint does fall under the responsibility of the DNI and is not an extraneous complaint that falls under any other rules.

S: are you responsible for preventing foreign election interference?

M: (stumbling)

S: Is it your priority?

M: Yes it is.

amb123

(1,581 posts)
84. Notice that Hurd kept saying "Good Copy. Good Copy"
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:33 AM
Sep 2019

Translation: "You (Acting DNI) said just what I wanted to hear, never mind whether it's the true or not. Thanks Pal!"

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
71. MaGuire: I think the greatest challenge we face is not a nuclear strike from Iran or Russia
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:15 AM
Sep 2019

but safeguarding the integrity of our elections.

M talks about cyberthreat.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
75. ADNI logic is 100% faulty, he doesn't get to rob a bank cause he's confused about the law about ...
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:24 AM
Sep 2019

... robbing banks, where in the hell does he think that's OK.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
78. Did this Repuke just say "dumocrats"?
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:27 AM
Sep 2019

And what’s this 11 page opinion that required him not to follow the law?

SharonClark

(10,014 posts)
86. Peter Welch up now.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:39 AM
Sep 2019

Explaining very patiently that sending the complaint to DOJ when Barr was mentioned in the complaint was wrong.

SharonClark

(10,014 posts)
89. Sean Patrick Maloney up now
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:45 AM
Sep 2019

Nice chitchat with Maquire about how long he's been on the job.
Questions Maquire about taking the whistle blowers complaint to the DOJ when Barr was listed in the complaint. Maloney said his judgement was bad.

Maquire, again, stated 'executive privilege' and said he works for the POTUS said his conversation with POTUS is privileged and confidential.

Schiff tried to give Maquire an out but he rufused to take it.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
88. Maguire will NOT answer as to whether he spoke to the president about this complaint
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:45 AM
Sep 2019

Maguire keeps saying he won't divulge the content and that he has many conversations.

Schiff still trying to get him to answer but Maguire will NOT answer.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
91. MY Congresswoman! Go, Val, Go!
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:47 AM
Sep 2019

She's softballing for now, setting up our relationship with Ukraine

Maguire spewing right-wing talking point that the US pays more for Ukraine's protection than anyone else.


OMG...he said it again! "If others were willing to step up" (and pay more)...total right wing talking point! Europe contributes billions!

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
92. Now she's leveling the boom...the US coercing Ukraine since Ukraine is so dependent upon the US
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:49 AM
Sep 2019

security assistance was suspended and no one knew why

SharonClark

(10,014 posts)
94. Raja Krishnamoorthi up now
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:54 AM
Sep 2019

Asked if Maquire had discussed Ukraine with Trump. He said in the 6 weeks he's been the acting DNI, he hasn't.
Maquire believes the whistle blower was acting in good faith.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
96. Nunes grandstanding saying the House needs to hold a vote on the floor if they want to impeach
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:59 AM
Sep 2019

that the Intel committee is not the place.

Sounds like he got his barking orders from Mark Levin.

The House won't vote on anything until investigations are over and Articles of Impeachment are ready.

FarPoint

(12,350 posts)
99. This is going nowhere!
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:01 PM
Sep 2019

Trump cycle....avoid any factual questions, wash, rinse repeat.....

I think I will just focus on the election process....remain a victim of Trump administration...

Jim__

(14,075 posts)
103. This guy is not qualified to be DNI.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:10 PM
Sep 2019

His concern is Trump's opinion, not the security of the country.

ecstatic

(32,688 posts)
105. Some questions need to be presented as requiring YES or NO responses only.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:11 PM
Sep 2019

This guy is so full of crap! His excuses do not make sense!

TheRealNorth

(9,478 posts)
106. If there was not a claim of executive privilege within 7 days.....
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:12 PM
Sep 2019

Isn't Maguire obliged to turn the complaint over to congress? Just because the WH hasn't decided to invoke executive privilege does not relieve him of his duty to follow the law? Am I missing something?

I would have liked to see them nailing him to the wall on that.

I also wish they would stop asking Maguire his opinion on hypotheticals that are not related to him.

I think the Dems need to bring in some professionals to cross-examine these criminals.

dem4decades

(11,283 posts)
108. Apparently it DNI doesn't think anything is a threat to the country.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:14 PM
Sep 2019

Foreign countries are probably jumping for joy.

Nasruddin

(752 posts)
116. Heinlein's razor
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:22 PM
Sep 2019

My feeling about this guy from seeing him on cspan is that he's just another
Trump admin crook, totally in the bag. Sorry.

Prudence suggests that one shouldn't ascribe to malice what can adequately be
explained by stupidity.

In either case, this guy must go.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
109. Schiff's second round of questions
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:14 PM
Sep 2019

MaGuire is not doing well at all. He's floundering badly, arguing it's not his business to render a judgment as to whether the congress should investigate this complaint, a damned serious charge that the president asked a foreign power to interfere in our election.

Schiff seems to be enjoying himself despite the fact he's not getting answers.

Schiff reads from the complaint and then asks MaGuire: We should pursue this, shouldn't we?

Maguire tries to pass the buck to the ICIG.

S: But you would agree, if this is a credible allegation, that the white house was moving communications into a secret server, that ought to be looked into, wouldn't you agree?

M: (evasive) I just absolutely have no knowledge. It's not under my authority or responsibility.

spooky3

(34,440 posts)
118. "I know nothink!" (Hogan's Heroes) I think Schiff's objective, if he couldn't get
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:23 PM
Sep 2019

Straight answers out of this tool, was to make it clear to everyone watching what a weak, dumb, toady Maguire is.

flibbitygiblets

(7,220 posts)
112. Schiff bringing up Ghouliani, Pence
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:18 PM
Sep 2019

Specifically that RG was doing what Mueller deemed "unethical and possibly illegal"

And that Pence postponed his trip until he knew wither Ukraine was going to "play ball"

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
113. Schiff asks about Giuliani's involvement.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:19 PM
Sep 2019

Schiff: Would you agree that to seek foreign assistance this way would be unpatriotic and unethical?

M: I am in no position to criticize the president or comment on what Mr. Giuliani does or doesn't do.

(Pathetic answer).

(This is sad... He refuses to offer an opinion on a black and white moral issue.)

Now Schiff asking about Pence cancelling a trip to Ukraine to put pressure on Ukraine.

Schiff asking about Trump issuing the order to cancel all aid to Ukraine and none of the higher-ups understanding why this suspension occurred. Schiff: Isn't that a little bit suspicious?

M: I don't know. I have no situational awareness... blah blah

Schiff: Well I can tell you, we are going to find out.

Schiff thanks the witness for appearing.

flibbitygiblets

(7,220 posts)
117. Now Schiff is apologizing to the people of Ukraine, pledging our support
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 12:22 PM
Sep 2019

in rooting out corruption; that what they are seeing from our POTUS is not democracy, it is the very "negation" of democracy.

We're adjourned!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»*************Whistle-blow...