Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eleny

(46,166 posts)
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:22 AM Sep 2019

It sounds like the whistleblower is high up in the chain of command of their agency

At a high level they wouldn't have done the foot work themselves but would have received reports from those who are at lower levels. Those people who work "on the ground" would report it up the chain to the person who ultimately decided to blow the whistle.

That's why the current DNI believes that the report is credible, imo.

The administration will try to minimize or dismiss the whistle blower as a nobody. But that's just spin. I believe that the person has to be very high up.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It sounds like the whistleblower is high up in the chain of command of their agency (Original Post) eleny Sep 2019 OP
I think it's Coats. Claritie Pixie Sep 2019 #1
Wasn't Coats gone when this phone call happened? n/t cynatnite Sep 2019 #2
Apparently the whistleblower had information relayed to him/her from others. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2019 #4
Ok I found this: Claritie Pixie Sep 2019 #6
I did, too eleny Sep 2019 #5
Yep-good call GusBob Sep 2019 #3
Agreed, eleny Leghorn21 Sep 2019 #7
Yeah, whoever this WBer is has his or her shit together Blue_Tires Sep 2019 #8
Well, some people remember their oath to our Constitution eleny Sep 2019 #9

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,181 posts)
4. Apparently the whistleblower had information relayed to him/her from others.
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:25 AM
Sep 2019

So that may or may not be a factor.

Claritie Pixie

(2,199 posts)
6. Ok I found this:
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:26 AM
Sep 2019

Coats says he didn't know the whistleblower complaint was working through the system. The inspector general's three-day review period ended August 15, Coats' last day as intelligence director. Coats says the complaint reached the desk of his acting successor the next day.

https://www.wibc.com/news/local-news/coats-no-prior-knowledge-whistleblower-complaint-which-led-impeachment-probe

eleny

(46,166 posts)
5. I did, too
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:26 AM
Sep 2019

I figure that Maguire would have to have enormous respect for the whistle blower. If it was his predecessor, especially Coates with his credibility, accepting the allegations would be a no brainer.

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
3. Yep-good call
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:24 AM
Sep 2019

The breadth depth and width of the detail of the WB report indicates someone with authority

Leghorn21

(13,524 posts)
7. Agreed, eleny
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:32 AM
Sep 2019

I don’t know nuttin, but have heard that a lot of this kind of intel work is “compartmentalized”, so that workers “on the ground” are not privy to what their fellow ground-workers are doing - so that, yes, only a higher-up-the-chain (agent?) would have access to “the big picture”.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
8. Yeah, whoever this WBer is has his or her shit together
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 11:32 AM
Sep 2019

and covered all the bases...

Makes you wonder how they ever got hired in the Trump administration in the first place, since slavish loyalty is always hired above job competency...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It sounds like the whistl...