Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEric Garland slams NYT for story about whistleblower: Not just unethical, but nat'l security risk
Long thread starting here:
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1038 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Eric Garland slams NYT for story about whistleblower: Not just unethical, but nat'l security risk (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Sep 2019
OP
exboyfil
(17,857 posts)1. Next week they plan to publish troop movements
And the following week Hydrogen bomb plans.
RAB910
(3,445 posts)2. The NY Times just lacks ethics
They have for a very long time now
Pacifist Patriot
(24,647 posts)3. I'm deeply dismayed by the decision to run this story.
Not only does this put the WB and anyone presumed to be the WB at risk, it smacks of a deliberate attempt to dissuade other potential WBers or witnesses from coming forward. It feels like intimidation!
stopdiggin
(11,092 posts)4. BS!!
and hysterical overstatement. Anyone who didn't think this was going to be a part of news and reporting .. is just plain naive. This is purely sh**-stirring by a person desperate for attention.
(by the way .. the people responsible for our "national security risk" .. are located in the west wing. get your head out!)