Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rustynaerduwell

(663 posts)
Sat Sep 28, 2019, 01:21 PM Sep 2019

This time "For the good of the country" means exposing the truth and not suppressing it.

Too often in our past the truth was suppressed "for the good of the country". The excuse was that the truth "could tear us apart". Nixon in Hanoi before the 1968 election. Reagan and Iran before the 1980 election. Any hint that Lee Harvey Oswald didn't act alone. 9/11, Saudi Arabia and the 28 pages. It has allowed for criminal and otherwise nefarious acts to be covered up under the guise of "national security".

This time, covering up the truth is what could tear this country apart. Now is the time for the precedent that a crime committed by the President is punishable. Punishable. Not just impeachment. No resignation followed by a pardon. Payment to society for a crime committed. For the good of the country.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This time "For the good of the country" means exposing the truth and not suppressing it. (Original Post) Rustynaerduwell Sep 2019 OP
Reagan & Iran before 1980 election not 1976 JHB Sep 2019 #1
Sorry Rustynaerduwell Sep 2019 #2

JHB

(37,157 posts)
1. Reagan & Iran before 1980 election not 1976
Sat Sep 28, 2019, 01:28 PM
Sep 2019

Let's add a bunch of Regan-Bush scandals while they were in office which, while investigations happened, people who were potentially the ultimate targets were in a position to stonewall, run the clock out, and leave the whole investigation hamstrung.

Could do so, and did do so.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This time "For the good o...