General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYT opinion: Impeachment is an act of desperation
Why do they allow this drivel to be posted??
There will be no resignation, there will be no conviction in the Senate.
But there will be an election. And by focusing on their obsession with the person of Donald Trump, Democrats are giving up the opportunity to talk about wages, employment, the shrinking middle class or any of the other things that motivate normal voters. After two and a half years of hearing about Russia, Russia, Russia, there are vanishingly few swing voters who want to spend the next 14 months hearing about Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine.
Why are all these talking heads trying to second guess our Speaker? IMO, she calculated correctly and is striking at the opportune time. Its getting frustrating to see the naysayers.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/09/27/opinion/impeachment-inquiry-trump.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
mucifer
(23,525 posts)Thekaspervote
(32,754 posts)OliverQ
(3,363 posts)There is nothing liberal about either newspaper.
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)That's inaccurate.
Publishing an opinion piece that presents a viewpoint differing from the editorial board's is normal practice.
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)Who is Mr. Buskirk you ask?
"Mr. Buskirk is the editor and publisher of the Journal American Greatness and a contributing opinion writer."
This is NOT the opinion of the NYT Editorial Board, and the OP should be updated to include the writer's name.
former9thward
(31,974 posts)The WA Post and NYT has articles -- usually multiple articles -- every day criticizing Trump. I get them in my email every day. I would shudder to think what a paper has to do for you to call it "liberal".
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Jesus.
OliverQ
(3,363 posts)You act like most Americans are smart enough to distinguish between an opinion piece and an editorial.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Especially Times readers.
It seems you may think that, but youd be mistaken.
Fullduplexxx
(7,857 posts)StTimofEdenRoc
(445 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,670 posts)Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)Caliman73
(11,730 posts)is be a Democrat for impeachment not to be desperate. He is an idiot. Skim the titles of his other op-eds and you will see what the idiot is all about.
ritapria
(1,812 posts)Are intent on protecting Donald Trump on issues of personal scandal ..They're his defense lawyers Russia-gate was bullshit and on and on and on .They won't ever fess up but they really like the guy ... I don't get it ..If you don't believe these guy exist , Check out YouTube
onenote
(42,693 posts)Do your homework.
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)"Mr. Buskirk is the editor and publisher of the Journal of American Greatness and a contributing opinion writer."
I don't know who you are referring to in your post. Why don't you NAME THEM or provide links?
leftstreet
(36,106 posts)CurtEastPoint
(18,639 posts)Girard442
(6,070 posts)Oh. Wait.
sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)election win in history, the greatest economy ever, and the largest inauguration crowd on earth.
Thekaspervote
(32,754 posts)Is it any wonder? Theyre going to let their conservative hack opinion writers finish them off?
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)One of them is Christopher Buskirk. I've never seen an op-ed by him in the NYT previously. He's not a David Brooks.
"Mr. Buskirk is the editor and publisher of the Journal American Greatness and a contributing opinion writer."
Throwing the baby out with the bathwater, the perfect the enemy of the good, etc. ad nauseum.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)Concern trolls. "Oh, it might UPSET moderates! Wait for the election!"
Oh, shut up, I say politely to these "moderates". Come back when things aren't so extreme.