General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPragerU is a Legit University, As Long as Dennis Prager Gets to Decide What That Means
https://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/prageru-is-a-legit-university-as-long-as-dennis-prager-gets-to-decide-what-that-means/Right-wing columnist and commentator Dennis Prager insists that his media enterprise PragerU is a legitimate university, as long as youre open to lying to yourself about what a university is.
During a PragerU Fireside Chat broadcast yesterday, Prager took issue with an August Los Angeles Times article that accurately noted that PragerU is not actually a university. Prager questioned what it truly means to be a university and contended that his communications shop, which publishes highly trafficked videos loaded with right-wing talking points presented as educational materials, was in fact a type of university.
Now if university means by definition you grant degrees and you are accredited by whoever accredits universities to be a degree-granting place, then were not a university, Prager said.
That is exactly what the word university means.
But is that the only definition? My contention is that it is a university, but it doesnt grant degrees and its not accredited, and thats absolutely accurate. We dont portray ourselves as what were not. But if a university is a place to learn and learn and learn, and study and study and study, and gain wisdom, then why arent we a university? Prager rhetorically asked.
To further strengthen his case, Prager compared his operation to something called Donut University, where people learn how to make doughy treats.
Igel
(35,282 posts)who did receive degrees.
Very often the credits transferred just fine as long as they passed review. But there was no body vouching for the credits ahead of time so there was a process, and you'd have to wait sometimes for admission or to find out which credits transferred. The institutions said "no" to accreditation because they refused to abide by some specific requirements, but beyond those specific violations things were just fine. It did mean that out of a choice of perhaps 50 or 60 courses, 2-3 violators wouldn't be transferrable.
In principle, it's no different from an institution whose accreditation was revoked, and there are some mainstream colleges and universities that have fallen in that category. (Same goes for some programs at universities, where the accreditation process for graduate programs isn't the same as for undergrad programs.)
I'd go with "degree-granting institution" as something that's pretty core to the definition these days, though.