General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNext Social Security raise could be low, and that's not even the worst part
Social Securitys cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, likely wont rise much next year, but retirees may not feel any change especially a positive one at all.
The COLA for 2020 wont be announced until next month, but one analyst expects just a 1.6% adjustment next year, down from 2.8% in 2019. Mary Johnson, the Social Security and Medicare policy analyst at the Senior Citizens League, a nonpartisan advocacy group for retirees, has been tracking COLA since 1996. She anticipated the 2.8% adjustment for last year the month before the Social Security Administration announced its COLA (and estimated correctly).
The 1.6% adjustment would amount to roughly $23 a month for someone receiving the average retirement benefit of $1,460, Johnson said. COLAs have been averaging 1.4% over the last decade, half of the average 3% it was between 2000 and 2009. Last years COLA was the first big hike since 2012, when it was 3.6% (in 2018, COLA was 2%, and in 2017, it was 0.3%).
But the significant drop in COLA between 2019 and 2020 may not be the worst part. Social Security as it stands bases its adjustment on CPI-W, the consumer-price index and buying patterns of young workers. But young workers and retirees dont spend their money the same way.
They will spend less on health care and perhaps housing, and those are the two expenses that really make a difference for older Americans, Johnson said. Young workers might spend between 7% to 10% of their money on health care, compared with older Americans, who can expect to spend 12% to 25% on it, she noted.
Social Security benefits have already lost one-third of buying power since 2000, another Senior Citizens League study by Johnson found. The system as a whole could use some attention from politicians, who are still debating if and how to expand the program. The two trust funds that support Social Security are running out of money, and if Congress doesnt act, they can be depleted by 2035. If that were to happen, Social Security would be relying on money coming into the system as opposed to revenue and reserves to keep benefits afloat and therefore, beneficiaries would receive only 80% of the checks theyre owed.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/next-social-security-raise-could-be-low-and-thats-not-even-the-worst-part/ar-AAHSPsr?li=BBnbfcN
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Thanks for posting.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)from SS that it never intends to pay back.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)Even when the money lent to Bush to fight the Iraq War ($3T) is paid back, you are still going to run out of money without doing something else (like raising the cap for example).
We will not hear the end of the whining as the $150B/yr. is paid back over the next 20 years or so as well.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)a kennedy
(29,658 posts)roamer65
(36,745 posts)The dollars you will get wont buy you shit, but you will get your fiat dollars.
Laurian
(2,593 posts)as well as increasing drug prices, we keep losing pace.
But Moscow Mitch cant be bothered to do anything but pack the courts.
CousinIT
(9,244 posts)God DAMN these idiots. They need to STOP telling people "social security is going broke!"
IT. IS. NOT. Nor will it ever be "depleted"
https://socialsecurityworks.org/faq/
EDIT TO ADD from the same link/URL:
It is NOT going to "run out of money" or be "depleted" unless TRUMP or some goddamned REPUBLICAN does something to it such that it becomes that way. Otherwise, as long as workers are paying into it, it will BE. THERE.
HOWEVER. The goddamned cap needs to be removed and the tax rate raised by a measely amount to cover that gap. Problem solved. That is FAR, FAR from it "running out of money", becoming "depleted", or "going broke".
These IDIOTS who write this bullshit need to do some research --- but they're too busy trying to convince Americans that "social security is going broke!" - that's RIGHTWING BULLSHIT.
WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)Article is from April but I haven't heard of any changes yet so it's probably still going to happen. Those of us who get a low end won get any less, legally that can't happen, but we won't get any more either (again).
Of course those who get more will get a bit but subtract the extra Medicare cost out of that $23 a month. $15 a month more... if you're lucky... and that and more will be gone with increases mostly coming up once Dolt45's hissy fit tariffs kick in.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/medicare-b-costs-for-retirees-projected-to-rise-11555978694
Medicares trustees projected Monday that the standard monthly premium in 2020 for Medicare Part B, which covers doctor visits and other types of outpatient care, will increase by $8.80 a month to $144.30. A final figure is expected in the fall.
This is really going to hurt the lower income seniors, disabled and veterans who rely only on Soc Security to make ends meet and are unable to work even part time to help stretch funds.
Oh and to save it... Scrap the dang cap. To help Soc Sec recipients change the CPI-W currently used to CPI-E which is geared towards how seniors actually spend their funds.
AllaN01Bear
(18,205 posts)when we had the cola last year , i got a letter from ssa stating i made too much and they dinged me untill i was brought down. i plan to visit them and appeal.
Response to AllaN01Bear (Reply #9)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
llmart
(15,539 posts)So each year seniors get farther and farther behind. I've already received my increase letter for my Part D. It's an even larger increase than I expected. I buy only the bare bones Part D supplement because I take no meds, so I guess they figure I deserve to have mine raised? Such logic. I haven't received any notice on how much my supplement policy premiums will increase.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,856 posts)My first two years on SS that's what happened, but last year I wound up with more because the Medicare amount, at least for me, didn't change.
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.