Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

RUMOUR: Breitbart to release whistleblower name (Original Post)
steve2470
Oct 2019
OP
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)1. If they release any name be it the WB or not
and person(s) get injured or worst, even to their friends and family, Breitbat should be charged, and the Republican party plus shithole should reap the consequences.
steve2470
(37,468 posts)2. I am sure she meant "Breitbart" :) nt
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,019 posts)4. Nah, Breitbat sums it up.
Or Breitguano.
zooks
(308 posts)3. Can that be construed as witness intimidation?
Mike 03
(18,542 posts)5. So now I'm wondering if it is not true, as was widely reported, that
the Mercers, who own or manage Breitbart, had a huge falling-out with Trump and no longer want anything to do with him and don't support him. Looking at Breitbart today, which I haven't done in years, is still really painful because as far as I can see they are totally and completely all in for Trump (to a degree that is embarrassing).
Roland99
(53,345 posts)6. Probably thought they'd get it from Jacob Wohl and that Burkman ass
lindysalsagal
(22,716 posts)7. Insiders already know who it is, so this just allows the violent
Magats a target for their contempt.
Frump already knows it's CIA, and it's a short list who know enough to write that report.
I hope the fellow CIA agents can protect him.