Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 04:03 PM Sep 2012

Sanders Welcomes Obama's Call to Undo Citizens United

Sanders Welcomes Obama's Call to Undo Citizens United

President Obama said a constitutional amendment should be considered to undo the 2010 Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United that paved the way for a flood of campaign cash from corporations and wealthy special interests. Obama made the comment Wednesday in an online chat with the website Reddit. "I applaud President Obama for expressing support for a serious effort to restore the democratic foundations of our country that are under severe attack as a result of the disastrous Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United," Sen. Bernie Sanders said on Thursday. Sanders is the chief sponsor of the Saving American Democracy Amendment. A companion measure in the House is sponsored by Rep. Ted Deutch.

During a conversation Wednesday on the website Reddit, Obama decried the "no-holds barred flow of seven- and eight-figure checks, most undisclosed, into super PACs." And Obama added, "I think we need to seriously consider mobilizing a constitutional amendment process to overturn Citizens United (assuming the Supreme Court doesn't revisit it). Even if the amendment process falls short, it can shine a spotlight of the super-PAC phenomenon and help apply pressure for change."

At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Citizens United on July 24, Sanders revealed that at least 23 billionaire families have contributed a minimum of $250,000 each so far in this year's campaigns. That includes oil industry titans David and Charles Koch, who are worth $50 billion and have indicated they will spend $400 million this election year, and Las Vegas casino tycoon Sheldon Adelson, who reportedly plans to put $100 million behind candidates and causes he favors.

"What the Supreme Court did in Citizens United is to tell billionaires like the Koch brothers and Sheldon Adelson, ‘You own and control Wall Street. You own and control coal companies. You own and control oil companies. Now, for a very small percentage of your wealth, we're going to give you the opportunity to own and control the United States government.' That is the essence of what Citizens United is all about," Sanders said. "That is why this disastrous decision must be reversed."

Vermont and five other states already have adopted resolutions asking Congress for a constitutional amendment to overturn the Citizens United decision. More than 200 local governments, including about 60 towns in Vermont, have passed similar measures.

Sanders' proposed amendment would say that for-profit corporations are not people, that they are not entitled to any rights under the Constitution, that they are subject to regulation by state legislatures consistent with free press protections, and that they are prohibited from making contributions or expenditures in our elections. The amendment also would declare that Congress and the states have the power to regulate and limit all political expenditures and contributions.



http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=f0efc69b-3cb7-4d79-9336-893ea55ce558


4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders Welcomes Obama's Call to Undo Citizens United (Original Post) ProSense Sep 2012 OP
I agree with everything in Senator Sanders' proposed Amendment. Loudly Sep 2012 #1
Kick! n/t ProSense Sep 2012 #2
I sure hope he goes after this Hutzpa Sep 2012 #3
DU rec...nt SidDithers Sep 2012 #4
 

Loudly

(2,436 posts)
1. I agree with everything in Senator Sanders' proposed Amendment.
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 04:19 PM
Sep 2012

It is pretty ambitious, though. In its explicit detail. When simplicity and stealth might serve the purpose better.

It shall not be an infringement of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution for Congress to limit by law the raising and expenditure of money in public elections.

There. Much tougher to nitpick. And goes right to the heart of Citizens United.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sanders Welcomes Obama's ...