Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it 20(?) repub senators needed to vote for removal in the Senate? If so, strategically, then, (Original Post) diva77 Oct 2019 OP
It is a sliding scale. Only 2/3 of senate needs to be PRESENT to vote on conviction. FM123 Oct 2019 #1
Interesting. tavernier Oct 2019 #3
Thanks for this. Do you think it's likely Moscow McTurd would allow this to happen? Does he have diva77 Oct 2019 #4
They have proforma sessions NewJeffCT Oct 2019 #6
I can't see any Senator missing something so historic Polybius Oct 2019 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author tavernier Oct 2019 #2
Vulnerable Republicans sit it out the vote to lower the threshold needed Buckeyeblue Oct 2019 #5
But vulnerable until when Midnightwalk Oct 2019 #7
Agreed. Just trying to frame it differently Buckeyeblue Oct 2019 #8
I agree with that too Midnightwalk Oct 2019 #9
They treat these elected positions like property Buckeyeblue Oct 2019 #10
Cult45 would still punish them in their next election. Garrett78 Oct 2019 #13
Start with the ones that are not standing for election next year. Volaris Oct 2019 #11
good idea, thanks diva77 Oct 2019 #12

FM123

(10,054 posts)
1. It is a sliding scale. Only 2/3 of senate needs to be PRESENT to vote on conviction.
Fri Oct 18, 2019, 03:16 PM
Oct 2019

According to Laurence Tribe, the Constitution doesn’t indicate that removal from office requires 2/3 of the Senate, it just requires 2/3 of senators present for the proceedings.

So in theory, a vote to convict the president would count as legal with as few as 34 members, not 67, assuming the absolute minimum of 51 participated.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/12/1891991/-How-the-GOP-Can-Convict-Trump-without-Voting-Him-Out

diva77

(7,650 posts)
4. Thanks for this. Do you think it's likely Moscow McTurd would allow this to happen? Does he have
Fri Oct 18, 2019, 03:44 PM
Oct 2019

control over any of this?

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
6. They have proforma sessions
Fri Oct 18, 2019, 03:50 PM
Oct 2019

when the senate should be in recess. Maybe the Democrats can secretly stay in DC and then all show up for one of the proforma sessions with 2 or 3 Republicans there.

Hey, the NC Republicans did that.

Response to diva77 (Original post)

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
5. Vulnerable Republicans sit it out the vote to lower the threshold needed
Fri Oct 18, 2019, 03:49 PM
Oct 2019

Then the can take a neutral stance. They can say, I could honestly see the case for impeachment both ways, so I abstained.

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
7. But vulnerable until when
Fri Oct 18, 2019, 04:12 PM
Oct 2019

Even before the primary there are filing deadlines. The threat of a primary challenge goes away early next year.

There is still the threat of a 3rd party challenge but if the trend of independent voters favoring impeachment continues it might be safer for some senators to vote yes.

The chances may be slim but every vote would help.

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
8. Agreed. Just trying to frame it differently
Fri Oct 18, 2019, 04:23 PM
Oct 2019

At some point Senators just have to say, convicting is the right thing to do. If it costs me my seat, so be it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it 20(?) repub senator...