General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhiteTara
(29,722 posts)global1
(25,272 posts)This is great!
Mosby
(16,366 posts)Where's the ac and heating ductwork?
It's not a house, it's a fancy shed.
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)Stinky The Clown
(67,819 posts)Plus, all that video shows was a "snapshot". I am sure the house has all of that.
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)a building permit for that house. After they get done laughing, they'll tell you you need engineered drawings and specs.
It's a cute idea, sort of. But it ignores wiring and plumbing, and you'll notice them using a rubber hammer in some photos to seat the side pieces. A lot of the cost for this system is in the millwork to create the hundreds and hundreds of pieces used to assemble this. For this to work, too, all of the wood used must be kiln-dried so it's dimensionally stable.
Building systems like this show up every once in a while, and then disappear, because they aren't practical, don't meet building codes, and for other reasons.
So, it's mildly interesting but regular stick-built houses go up quickly, too, up to the framing and siding phases. Wiring, plumbing and finishing work takes up most of the time in building newly-constructed homes.
However, if you find the website for that building system, I'll bet you can invest in it with the people who invented it. Soon, there will be flying cars, err...wooden block houses going up everywhere in Blue Sky, Wisconsin. Yah, sure, you betcha...
Mosby
(16,366 posts)You can see that they used some silicon in a corner, the walls are basically not waterproof.
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)When I was designing projects for Family Handyman magazine, one of them was a 10' X 12' shed/workshop, with a 10/X12' concrete apron in front of it. It used clear redwood T&G siding over a typical frame construction with a shed roof. It also was fully-wired, had a sunroof and a solar-heated roof. From the time I built the forms for the concrete slab until I was taking photos of the finished project, it all took just one week, and I was working by myself with no helpers, except for a kid who helped me screed the concrete.
It took me almost as long do to the drawings for the project after it was completed. I also had to take step-by-step photos throughout the construction, using a camera on a tripod and a self-timer.
Stick frame construction goes pretty quickly. I'm a fast worker with outstanding skills, or was at the time, anyhow, back in the 1980s.
When it was finished, it was a tight, comfortable building, built to code. It was on the cover of Family Handyman in 1984 or 86. I can't remember.
One week to build. By myself.
FakeNoose
(32,777 posts)One spark in the wrong place and it would go up in smoke almost immediately.
This might be a nice idea for a shed or small barn though.
fierywoman
(7,695 posts)MineralMan
(146,333 posts)yewberry
(6,530 posts)tinrobot
(10,916 posts)Not any cheaper than stick-built.
You also have to build on stilts. No slabs.
https://www.homecrux.com/build-house-without-nails-or-screws-thanks-to-brikawood-interlocking-wooden-bricks/65913/
Disaffected
(4,569 posts)The walls leaked like a sieve (both water and air, especially at the corners) and, had poor insulation value. Finally had to clad it in rigid insulation and siding.
Building that thing was the worst decision I have ever made. It's OK now but I cry whenever I think of how much effort went in to it.
Duppers
(28,127 posts)The air leakage, I mean, and the more narrow widths in which to install insulation. You could even see open air pockets in the video, especially on the corners.
It would also be a tinder-box, would it not? A log home, on the other hand, would be much less likely to burn easily.