Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Tue Oct 22, 2019, 01:36 PM Oct 2019

"I'm in charge of the Hatch Act," Trump "barked" at Mulvaney, calling him "weak"...



In one disturbing tale WSJ White House reporter Michael Bender relays how Trump has apparently grown frustrated with White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney – his third in under three years – and attacked him during a meeting with other aides present.

President Trump wanted to bring his Cabinet to a June rally in the critical swing state of Florida. Appropriately, Mulvaney warned the president about the Hatch Act, which prohibits executive branch employees from using their positions for political activities.

“I’m in charge of the Hatch Act,” Trump “barked” at Mulvaney, calling his chief of staff, one of the most powerful people in the nation, “weak.”

Trump is not “in charge” of the Hatch Act. It is an 80-year old federal law that was amended in 2012.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/im-in-charge-of-the-hatch-act-trump-barked-at-weak-chief-of-staff-mick-mulvaney-in-a-room-full-of-aides/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"I'm in charge of the Hatch Act," Trump "barked" at Mulvaney, calling him "weak"... (Original Post) Miles Archer Oct 2019 OP
Asshole truly believes that no law applies to him. Period. COLGATE4 Oct 2019 #1
He's correct, though jberryhill Oct 2019 #2
That's why Kellyanne Conway still works there jberryhill Oct 2019 #3
I saw a "count" of her violations last week... Miles Archer Oct 2019 #4
This is insane. Ilsa Oct 2019 #5
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
2. He's correct, though
Tue Oct 22, 2019, 02:12 PM
Oct 2019

The decision to fire a federal employee for a Hatch Act violation ultimately rests with the president.

That's what happened with the OSC's recommendation that Kellyanne Conway be fired for violating it. Trump declined to do so.

---
In June 2019, the OSC sent a letter to President Trump recommending that White House counselor Kellyanne Conway be removed from federal service for repeatedly violating the Hatch Act. This report follows the March 2018 OSC finding that Conway was a "repeat offender" for disparaging Democratic presidential candidates while in her official capacity during televised interviews and on social media. President Trump, when asked at a press conference, stated he thought the provision violated her free speech rights.
----

The Hatch Act, incidentally expressly does not apply to the president.
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
3. That's why Kellyanne Conway still works there
Tue Oct 22, 2019, 02:14 PM
Oct 2019

Enforcement of the Hatch Act is, indeed, solely within the executive branch and subject to the president's approval.

Conway has been found in violation repeatedly. The Office of Special Counsel has recommended she be fired. Trump has declined to do so.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
4. I saw a "count" of her violations last week...
Tue Oct 22, 2019, 02:19 PM
Oct 2019

...can't remember if it was 30 or 50...something like that. Definitely not "low single digits."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"I'm in charge of the Hat...