Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's lawyer tells Judge Denny Chin that if Trump were to shoot someone on Fifth Avenue....
RadicalUnelectedHat RetweetedHere is Trump's lawyer, William Consovoy, telling Judge Denny Chin that if Trump were to shoot someone on fifth avenue, he could not be criminally investigated while in office.
Very normal argument.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 887 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's lawyer tells Judge Denny Chin that if Trump were to shoot someone on Fifth Avenue.... (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2019
OP
RandySF
(58,900 posts)1. JFC
calimary
(81,316 posts)2. Yeah, no shit.
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)7. I actually said that out loud and in full when I saw the tweet.
2naSalit
(86,646 posts)3. Has the recess ended?
NBC live feed is still silent.
zaj
(3,433 posts)4. These people are crazy and wrong
This is how the Holocaust came about. Incremental rationalizing that then next step isn't extreme. And the next step isn't extreme. And the next step isn't extreme.
The lawyer called it immunity.
That's not a thing written down anywhere. But the introduction of the idea is dangerous and powerful.
This is an extremely important ruling, to understate the matter
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
mahatmakanejeeves This message was self-deleted by its author.
RGTIndy
(203 posts)6. This is the natural extension of the "unitary executive theory"
The neocons used it to argue immunity from war crimes, Trump uses it to argue immunity for plain old every day crimes.