Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachel Maddow tweet:US Justice Dept's argument for staying Mueller grand jury docs embarrasing
Rachel Maddow MSNBC
@maddow
·
4h
We have seen a lot of nutball filings from a lot of, uh, colorful lawyers in the various Trump era scandals.
To see this kind of terrible work from US Justice Department lawyers is a whole different level of embarrassment.
Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney
FWIW, this argument by DOJ in its brief asking Howell for a stay is not correct. Pelosi has never "announced" that the impeachment inquiry would exclude Mueller-related charges.
The story they cite doesn't suggest it either.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1371 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (17)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Maddow tweet:US Justice Dept's argument for staying Mueller grand jury docs embarrasing (Original Post)
iluvtennis
Oct 2019
OP
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)1. Oh yeah
Stories in the Washington Post totally carry the weight of a legal argument, particularly in the absence of any statutory law or case precedent that would support a party's position.
TheRealNorth
(9,500 posts)2. Democrats could also simply argue
That based on information collected since Sept 29th that the scope has expanded (if it matters).
Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)3. It doesn't matter. House has "sole power" per Constitution.
Democrats are the majority thank heavens, and they write the rules.
Response to gratuitous (Reply #1)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
triron
(22,026 posts)5. Yes this seems absurd.