General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPacifist Patriot
(24,654 posts)Keep at it nimrods.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,400 posts)Pacifist Patriot
(24,654 posts)It will work with some people for certain.
livetohike
(22,157 posts)idiocy and how desperate they appear.
hibbing
(10,107 posts)I'm doing my best to hang in there with this. I'm far from a lawyer, looks like they are fishing for sound bites to hammer over and over and over and then amplified by state television.
Peace
uponit7771
(90,353 posts)bdamomma
(63,917 posts)Castor guy???
uponit7771
(90,353 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)He's completely incompetent! He's asking leading questions that the witness would have no information on, he's getting nowhere.... Oh, wait... Maybe that's the whole purpose?
He can't really ask any witness a substantive question because in would further implicate Trump.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,400 posts)uponit7771
(90,353 posts)Mr. Sparkle
(2,938 posts)crickets
(25,982 posts)Pacifist Patriot
(24,654 posts)He can't go after the essential substance of the charge so he has to discredit witnesses on irrelevant matters.
blogslut
(38,007 posts)It is not working
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)That seems like he's inviting an unpleasant surprise.
crickets
(25,982 posts)This ferret is not getting the answers he wants. But then it's all just a sham reason to spout conspiracies. Ugh.
Correct?
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)know it was a real rule in cross-examination.
crickets
(25,982 posts)are not good and can backfire. This guy is fishing, and trying to inject points without actually asking a question in places. He's lost, and I love Taylor's incredulous reactions. They are entirely appropriate.
CapnSteve
(219 posts)OK, juvenile of me, I know! God, their lawyer looks sleazy...have him and Mooones muted...
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)They knew he was allied already with Putin, wanted for putin to get Crimea back. Why wouldn't they want Clinton to win?
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)but they didn't, and there is no proof they did.
Not a gotcha question to anyone thinking logically.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)the president of Ukraine, Poroshenko, at that time was corrupt, wasn't he? I believe he was a russian oligarch.
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)Was the summary cryptic because it was written in Ukrainian? What an idiot.
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)What an ass.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)uponit7771
(90,353 posts)... the answers to.
uponit7771
(90,353 posts)AnotherMother4Peace
(4,251 posts)demmiblue
(36,875 posts)Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)crickets
(25,982 posts)Oh, puh-leez.
livetohike
(22,157 posts)hibbing
(10,107 posts)It seems like they are getting what they want, a smear against Hunter Biden and Joe. Not dealing with the accusations against tiny hands at all.
Peace
jimlup
(7,968 posts)is that false narrative. But their base will eat it up and believe it unto death. That is why we have to win in one year.
uponit7771
(90,353 posts)... their base did worse than 2012 rMoney in votes the reason why Clinton lost the 5 Red lead VSM states was the VERY VERY unusual over performance of 3rd party candidates and strange voting in Detroit were 40,000 people voted for state official but not a presidential candidate.
I'm sick of the commentary focusing on red dons base, they sucked in 2016 its just the VERY VERY strange overperformance of Stein and Johns that helped Trump.
I too think Detroit was stolen. They didn't need to flip votes all they had to do was mix votes up and disallow enough votes and they did that. I'm pretty sure of it actually.
But if I share that publicly everyone I say it to thinks I'm insane. I know in my gut Detroit was stolen. I live in Ann Arbor and I've seen enough of Detroit to know how easy it would be for an interested party to disrupt the vote in Detroit.
uponit7771
(90,353 posts)Bayard
(22,128 posts)Which the Ambassadors have no clue about. He keeps making statements, then at the end saying--Agreed?
nolabear
(41,990 posts)nolabear
(41,990 posts)This lawyer is trying to create narrative and theyre not helping. This is all falling very flat.
crickets
(25,982 posts)by clearly stating they do not know about what he's saying, or drilling into the details that are pertinent but not necessarily helpful to the side points Castor is trying to inject. Both Kent and Taylor are doing a good job with this mess.
nolabear
(41,990 posts)The righties are the only people being smarmy and inuendo-filled. Everyone else is confident and professional.
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)No not really. But dont you know about. No.
Now were on could the side channel have been more outlandish. Yes it could have been.
Did you try get control of the channel. No because we were both saying were setting up a meeting.
Taylor clarifies problem is irregular channel started working against the normal channel
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)nolabear
(41,990 posts)crickets
(25,982 posts)to quickly pivot from Trump's crimes to attempts to smear Hunter Biden. None of this is pertinent to withholding of funds from Ukraine. None. It's nauseating and if MSNBC's reaction to the first question session is any indication, I think they are going to get called on it HARD.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)as well as justify why there was a parallel foreign policy channel going on.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)as if that is something normal.
Bayard
(22,128 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)blaze
(6,368 posts)trying very hard not to appear to be attacking a solid, respected witness
crickets
(25,982 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)and I believe the same lawyer did questioning during the closed-door sessions.
sop
(10,229 posts)in the same sentence as many times as possible. That's what will be on FOX News this evening.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)elleng
(131,067 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)And Schiiff is now clarifying the actual "weeds" and the timeframe, which happened way before the Bidens were involved.
elleng
(131,067 posts)Adam Schiff can be relied on to find, name, and explore weeds, and any other noxious matters!!!
crazytown
(7,277 posts)A big loud one, in place of the hammer
demmiblue
(36,875 posts)Link to tweet
TlalocW
(15,388 posts)He already knows all the dirt on his dad. This is like watching someone dryly summing up scene-by-scene a movie he's seen 20 times before.
TlalocW
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)elleng
(131,067 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)crickets
(25,982 posts)Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)Not interested in any of the oligarchs or other matters. Only about the Bidens
Schiff is doing good in his 5 minutes
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)GOP lawmakers tasked Stephen Castor with questioning Bill Taylor, the acting ambassador to Ukraine, and George Kent, a State Department deputy who covers Ukraine, and the staunch Republican Fleischer wasnt impressed.
Whatever the GOP counsel is doing, its not working, Fleischer tweeted. I dont undertand where hes going.
Taylor and Kent told lawmakers that Trump and his associates set up a separate diplomatic channel that appeared to be aimed at pressuring Ukraine to assist the presidents re-election campaign, but Castors questions focused on establishing a conspiracy theory the witnesses had already debunked.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/its-not-working-ari-fleischer-baffled-by-house-gop-questions-in-impeachment-inquiry/
crickets
(25,982 posts)Wow.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)Iwasthere
(3,169 posts)Their going to regret putting him there
elleng
(131,067 posts)Gothmog
(145,486 posts)This idiot either did not take the bar exam or failed it. Gym Jordan is not a member of the bar
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)uponit7771
(90,353 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,400 posts)uponit7771
(90,353 posts)shanti
(21,675 posts)Putz!
crickets
(25,982 posts)bdamomma
(63,917 posts)abrupt Gym Jordan.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)be literal.
phylny
(8,385 posts)Gothmog
(145,486 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Jordan is a fucking, screeching fact- twisting bully just trying to intimidate taylor. Taylor won;t be intimidated.
Sombody needs to punch that shit bag in the face !!
GO TAYLOR !! SInk the fucker!!!!
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)shanti
(21,675 posts)keeps covering the names of the speakers on the left! Thanks for the info.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)and they put up a chyron with the name...
Bayard
(22,128 posts)Jordan is obnoxious. Screeching as fast as possible, and not letting Taylor get out answers.
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)@DavidCornDC
.
@Jim_Jordan seems to be saying that because President Zelensky did not publicly state there was a linkage between the US military aide and the investigations that these conditions didn't exist. #impeachment
1:44 PM · Nov 13, 2019·Twitter Web App
Link to tweet
elleng
(131,067 posts)Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)Keeps asserting no linkage of investigation to security dollars. Finally asked a question
Third meeting with Johnson security dollars came up. But no linkage. So why why why
Because sondland told him that twice.
Read a complex phrase loudly and repetitively from sondland. Taylor gets answer right and says sondland confirmed there was a linkage.
coeur_de_lion
(3,681 posts)was if Taylor was himself was participating in the shakedown.
He's talking as if Taylor should have brought up a public announcement to Zelensky when he met with him 3 different times.
Why the fuck would he do that?
He was not a participant in tRump's schemes.
blogslut
(38,007 posts)Link to tweet
David Corn
@DavidCornDC
.@Jim_Jordan seems to be saying that because President Zelensky did not publicly state there was a linkage between the US military aide and the investigations that these conditions didn't exist. #impeachment
coeur_de_lion
(3,681 posts)that makes Taylor's statements wrong.
Nope.
The pressure existed.
The withholding of the aid definitely happened.
Taylor himself had nothing to do with it.
sop
(10,229 posts)to announce an investigation into Biden/Burisma/2016 elections, demonstrating he was caving to the pressure being placed on him by Trump's henchmen.
coeur_de_lion
(3,681 posts)And I bet the Faux news lovers are eating it up.
hibbing
(10,107 posts)crickets
(25,982 posts)rather than bothering to defend the president's behavior. Kudos to him for that.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Trumps base will have a collective swoon over it, though. Glad his base is atrophying.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)budkin
(6,713 posts)This should be good.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)madaboutharry
(40,217 posts)President Zelensky was in no position to complain about his interactions with Trump.
That is what happens when you are desperate for money and military aid.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)livetohike
(22,157 posts)This is not going well for him.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)elleng
(131,067 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)elleng
(131,067 posts)crickets
(25,982 posts)The shouting and smearing stops and proceedings go back to a civilized tone and pace. The contrast is so jarring; it just underscores how little Republicans have aside from conspiracies, smears, and theatrics.
helpmenow
(16 posts)budkin
(6,713 posts)Bwahahahahaahahahahaa
elleng
(131,067 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)coeur_de_lion
(3,681 posts)he will be believed.
No, only thing that happens is the witness is offended and our ears hurt.
He is also asking the witness -- a fact witness -- can form an opinion about things he is not there to form opinions about.
Also -- just because Zelensky never got on TV to announce an investigation of Biden does not mean he wasn't asked to do so.
TlalocW
(15,388 posts)Hopefully, it won't here.
TlalocW
coeur_de_lion
(3,681 posts)Just can't handle the lies and obfuscation.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)Tech
(1,771 posts)the sound they are done talking. They don't seem to understand how closely many of us have been following everything.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)backtoblue
(11,345 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)Mersky
(4,986 posts)And otherwise, I challenge you to come down to reality, Ratcliffe.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/bill-taylor-fires-back-at-jim-jordan-i-dont-consider-myself-a-star-witness-for-anything/
At the first public hearing on the impeachment of President Donald Trump, Jordan accused Taylor of being the star witness for Democratic lawmakers.
I dont consider myself a star witness for anything, Taylor replied after Jordans time expired.
They do! Jordan erupted, motioning toward the Democratic Partys side of the room.
Please dont interrupt the witness, Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) cautioned.
I was clear about that I am not here to take one side or another or to advocate any particular outcome, and let many restate that, Taylor insisted. And the main thing is that my understanding is only coming from people that I talked to.
crickets
(25,982 posts)so another has been started. Impeachment thread 6 is live here:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212681960
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)Yielding time to Schiff.
BumRushDaShow
(129,346 posts)Jim__
(14,082 posts)... said Trump did not have the authority to withhold it?
I've only been watching intermittently and have seen republicans repeatedly say Zelinsky didn't do anything but the aid was released anyway. Therefore there was no requirement for Zelinsky to do anything. The democrats need to hammer back that this is essentially a lie.
klook
(12,164 posts)that Zelensky didnt do anything to get the aid.
Well, of COURSE he didnt!!
- The aid was appropriated by Congress, and therefore shouldnt require any further action by Ukraine.
- The demand was for action by the Ukrainian president to keep the Congressionally approved aid.
Of course, Ratcliffe knew that and was deliberately trying to confuse the public.
nini
(16,672 posts)LOL
They GOT NOTHING
Response to crickets (Original post)
blogslut This message was self-deleted by its author.