What difference does it make if ambassador Taylor met Trump?

[question everything]

Jordan tried to make it a “Gutcha” comment but why?

[guillaumeb]

1. It makes no difference.

It is a variant of the smoking gun theory that the GOP insists on employing.

[spanone]

2. THEY have nothing.

[abqtommy]

3. My understanding is that Gym Jordan said that all the testimony today was second-hand hearsay

and had no legitimacy due to that. He/Jordan also said that the narrow focus of one phone call wasn't
enough to base impeachment on and I agree with that since there's so much more to base impeachment on. Sounds like Jimmy Boy would like us to think the impeachment process should be held to the same standards as admissible evidence in a criminal trial and that's not how impeachment is set up.

[question everything]

4. Interesting. Of course, not all his testimony was hearsay

This is why he kept detailed records. I think that only the last revealation was but this assistant will appear later.

[Lars39]

5. With an insecured phone involved, there's

recordings to back up his testimony.

[chriscan64]

6. I have third hand knowledge that the Hindenburg exploded

But no one makes the jump to "therefore it's false". The person who told Taylor they overheard Trump could be called in to make the allegation more direct, but this is all moot since the "transcript" contains the crime.

[MFGsunny]

7. Repukes in general, and Gym Jack-et-off in particular .....

would want us to believe every syllable from credible, non-partisan professionals is nothing more than UDDER FODDER.

Nothing like burnishing the REPUKES brand. /sarcasm

[question everything]

9. Right, and they still support their lying hero

[Wounded Bear]

8. Typically, ambassadors would talk to the Sec of State, not the Pres...

More bullshit process arguments by Repubs.

[Tommy_Carcetti]

10. None. The answer is none.

Jim Jordan's gonna Jim Jordan.