Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI haven't seen anyone on MSNBC comment on this *excellent* snark from the hearings today:
Daniel Goldman: (30:12)
I want to spend just a little time reading the transcript as weve been encouraged to do.
https://www.rev.com/blog/impeachment-hearings-first-day-transcript-bill-taylor-george-kent-testimony-transcript
I want to spend just a little time reading the transcript as weve been encouraged to do.
https://www.rev.com/blog/impeachment-hearings-first-day-transcript-bill-taylor-george-kent-testimony-transcript
I cawed loudly when he delivered that so deadpan.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 1916 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I haven't seen anyone on MSNBC comment on this *excellent* snark from the hearings today: (Original Post)
eppur_se_muova
Nov 2019
OP
So much better than the usual 5 min. side v/s side circus. This format actually provides a lot of
napi21
Nov 2019
#10
dem4decades
(11,297 posts)1. I was surprised they let it continued to be called a transcript. It's not.
Why let Republicans call it that.
Ligyron
(7,633 posts)3. "So called transcript" would be perfect
There's always next time.
eppur_se_muova
(36,269 posts)4. Um, OK .... "heavily edited excerpt" ? Sounds more accurate to me. nt
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)2. Dan Goldman was great.
They should refer to it as the summary.
napi21
(45,806 posts)10. So much better than the usual 5 min. side v/s side circus. This format actually provides a lot of
good information & would be great for both sides IF the Pubs actually HAD some good info to present. Unfortunately, all they can do is distract, delay, and lie.
WA-03 Democrat
(3,050 posts)5. Bravo!
Dan Goldman for President!
Masterful job today. Controlled, cool and beautifully effective. So proud of our Democratic Congress!
greyl
(22,990 posts)6. Me neither, thanks for the reminder. nt
brush
(53,791 posts)7. Pls quote the snark. Can't find it at the link. Is it a ref to that foto?
eppur_se_muova
(36,269 posts)8. The snark is excerpted in the OP. Context is the pix immediately below.
Maybe the problem is that the timings start over at 0:00 for each heading change ?
Use your broswer's search function to find the string "30:12". There's only one.
Ms. Toad
(34,076 posts)9. The snark is quoted.
I want to spend just a little time reading the transcript as weve been encouraged to do.
brush
(53,791 posts)12. So that's a ref to the paid shills in the T-shirts behind trump? That's really subtle.
Ms. Toad
(34,076 posts)14. I caught it instantly when he said it - impressed that it was said with a
completely straight face.
Beringia
(4,316 posts)11. Here it is on cspan right at the start
canetoad
(17,169 posts)13. Yeah, that was good
I heard it live and was about to post but the moment passed. K&R
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)15. I heard it and had a good chuckle.