Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What About Other Witnesses That Should Appear Before This Committee That..... (Original Post) global1 Nov 2019 OP
Start enforcing subpoenas C_U_L8R Nov 2019 #1
I was just wondering TheRealNorth Nov 2019 #2
Objecting to a subpoena is not a crime jberryhill Nov 2019 #3
Thanks for the response TheRealNorth Nov 2019 #4
There's another layer of complication here jberryhill Nov 2019 #5
I would say yes TheRealNorth Nov 2019 #6
pretty much everybody is going to be gone for TG break librechik Nov 2019 #7

TheRealNorth

(9,481 posts)
2. I was just wondering
Thu Nov 21, 2019, 04:10 PM
Nov 2019

If someone refuses to show up for a subpoena, is there any sort of statute of limitations that would prevent them from being punished later, presuming William Barr is no longer AG after Jan 2021?

Or is ignoring a subpoena technically not a crime?

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
3. Objecting to a subpoena is not a crime
Thu Nov 21, 2019, 04:32 PM
Nov 2019

The process is, to put it mildly, not as simple as many people on DU seem to believe.

No, a lawyer in a civil lawsuit, a Congressional committee, or anyone else empowered to formulate and serve subpoenas is not somehow automatically entitled to whatever they ask of whomever they ask it. There are many valid reasons for not complying with a subpoena, and there is a process for adjudicating objections to them. Whether the participants choose to avail themselves of those processes is up to them.
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
5. There's another layer of complication here
Thu Nov 21, 2019, 10:02 PM
Nov 2019

The WH witnesses are claiming a complete immunity from having to testify.

While there is a legitimate scope of executive privilege in official deliberations, the claim they are making goes well beyond the scope of privilege ever recognized.

The question is, with the current composition of the court, would you like to spin the wheel and have the court issue a decision that would greatly expand the power of the presidency to an extent that it would take a generation to undo?

TheRealNorth

(9,481 posts)
6. I would say yes
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 02:33 PM
Nov 2019

I want to know the rules of the game. That way it's clear and they can't come back later and say the rules are different when it's our side under subpoena.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
7. pretty much everybody is going to be gone for TG break
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 05:10 PM
Nov 2019

during that break, staffers are still working report is getting written and court decisions will happen. So we might as well chill til the judge tells Bolton to honor the subpoena. Then they'll get together again in January and sweep up. Seems like the only thing we can do.

We nailed our case. Season's Greetings!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What About Other Witnesse...