Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1089 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reports of Iraqi casualties (Original Post)
RandySF
Jan 2020
OP
AP: US official: Very few if any casualties from Iranian attack on sites in Iraq.
Dennis Donovan
Jan 2020
#2
enough
(13,259 posts)1. Of no concern to Trump or Republicans. NT
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)2. AP: US official: Very few if any casualties from Iranian attack on sites in Iraq.
onecaliberal
(32,864 posts)3. Sadly, who believes the US officials?
I certainly dont.
stillcool
(32,626 posts)4. really, it's like a news black-out..
Bill Gates has to make another information highway. This one is all clogged up.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)5. I tend to believe the unnamed ones over the named ones
onecaliberal
(32,864 posts)7. Me too.
sarisataka
(18,663 posts)6. They are more believable
than a reported report...