Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
105 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Harry & Meghan are going to chill with the royalty thing (Original Post) Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 OP
I think this is a smart and sensible move. CaliforniaPeggy Jan 2020 #1
They don't have enough wealth and rich lifestyle yet? braddy Jan 2020 #2
I don't understand your question? StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #3
Read their statement, they are going to devote themselves to making more money. braddy Jan 2020 #11
That's not what they said StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #13
Meghan was already a multimillionaire and Harry is worth many 10s of millions and more always coming braddy Jan 2020 #17
Oh, Good Lord StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #19
Yes it is, when the super rich say we are taking a break to devote ourselves to making us braddy Jan 2020 #24
Yes. Working to be financially independent usually means making enough money to live on StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #25
When is enough, enough, they already have up to 50 million dollars, that isn't financially secure? braddy Jan 2020 #28
So you think they should just live off of the tax money and not bother to try to earn a living? StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #30
I'll repeat it, they already have 10s of millions of their own money, Meghan alone was a braddy Jan 2020 #31
Perhaps they like working. Skidmore Jan 2020 #87
They didn't say they were going to start, stop, or change "working", they said they were going to braddy Jan 2020 #88
Folks at this level don't ever have to do a lick of actual work Nature Man Jan 2020 #90
The envy and hate is pretty interesting StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #94
It is interesting. Skidmore Jan 2020 #95
Or. Blue_true Jan 2020 #77
they cant even earn their own money as royals..it was an allowance... samnsara Jan 2020 #101
Read the thread, they are worth about 45 million dollars she alone brought about 5 million into the braddy Jan 2020 #105
+1 happybird Jan 2020 #27
+1 bronxiteforever Jan 2020 #34
Why wouldn't one hate royalty? Codeine Jan 2020 #57
What did Harry do to earn your contempt, other than be born? StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #58
Honestly, that's enough when you're dealing with Codeine Jan 2020 #59
So can black people just hate random white people because they were born white? StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #62
I frankly wouldn't blame them a bit. Codeine Jan 2020 #64
This is the sort of thing that turns off independents to Socialists Zolorp Jan 2020 #103
Meghan didn't inherit treestar Jan 2020 #69
never mind that she married into the BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY Nature Man Jan 2020 #91
What has that have to do Skidmore Jan 2020 #96
They don't confer the prestige that is the hallmark Nature Man Jan 2020 #98
are you sure on that? NJCher Jan 2020 #33
Yes, their current and ever growing personal wealth is estimated at 45 million dollars. Meghan's braddy Jan 2020 #37
you are correct NJCher Jan 2020 #50
I don't own a TV and barely know anything about these celebrities. braddy Jan 2020 #52
-- NJCher Jan 2020 #65
Post removed Post removed Jan 2020 #78
it surprised me Skittles Jan 2020 #86
I didn't know they were house-hunting in California! Probably not my neighborhood, but still-- Hekate Jan 2020 #48
Meghan acted on several Skidmore Jan 2020 #97
Markle was absolutely not a "multimillionaire" -- lol obamanut2012 Jan 2020 #70
Yes she was a multi millionaire. braddy Jan 2020 #75
She was worth about $5 million before she married csziggy Jan 2020 #82
Maybe they'll just cut back on crowns, ermine capes, and royal processions. tinrobot Jan 2020 #38
But they already have 45 million and more guaranteed through celebrity, do they really need to braddy Jan 2020 #41
Why do you CARE? StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #43
It was you who posted to me. braddy Jan 2020 #49
It's a discussion board. cwydro Jan 2020 #83
Obviously, they have enough to be "independent", then. tinrobot Jan 2020 #46
I see no reason to avoid mentioning that this couple is destroying the planet. braddy Jan 2020 #51
Except they aren't -- your anger at them is strange and misplaced obamanut2012 Jan 2020 #71
Lol, no anger here, but the jet setting gazillionaires are indeed conspicuous consumers braddy Jan 2020 #76
They took 4 private jets in 11 days, all the while preaching about saving the planet. cwydro Jan 2020 #80
I interpreted it to mean they want to slowly transition into a private life. Doremus Jan 2020 #55
Could be. braddy Jan 2020 #56
I hear you. Both are millionaires. Tipperary Jan 2020 #68
A "commoner" he'd be if that happened CountAllVotes Jan 2020 #102
No kidding, the time for monarchs janterry Jan 2020 #6
I judge people by the content of their character, not by title or wealth Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #12
I'm merely commenting on their declaration to devote themselves to making more money, they are braddy Jan 2020 #14
You seem to want them to just live off of the royal coffers and not try to support themselves StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #15
He is worth 10s of millions and she brought her millions into the marriage, they don't need to braddy Jan 2020 #18
Every dime that he's "worth" comes straight from the British taxpayers StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #21
"Earn"? Codeine Jan 2020 #61
What makes you think that someone in his social class Nature Man Jan 2020 #92
My daughter went to high school with Meghan. tinrobot Jan 2020 #40
That is so nice to hear!! renate Jan 2020 #42
Now see? I would've guessed that about her. Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #45
"Hey, people, leave those kids alone." 🎶 LakeArenal Jan 2020 #4
The London tabloids are so brutal on them kimbutgar Jan 2020 #5
K & R! Iliyah Jan 2020 #7
K&R, wishing them all the best. nt PunkinPi Jan 2020 #8
Distancing themselves from the Pedo supporting Royal Family HipChick Jan 2020 #9
That might've been the final straw Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #10
funny, but I don't think so NJCher Jan 2020 #36
Exactly. ZZenith Jan 2020 #26
who also kiss trump's ass at every opportunity EveHammond13 Jan 2020 #35
They loathe TRump, and literally have never kissed his ass obamanut2012 Jan 2020 #72
Good move on their part. llmart Jan 2020 #16
Megan misses the states and wants to live a more normal life TeamPooka Jan 2020 #20
Harry has reportedly long been uncomfortable with his royal role DavidDvorkin Jan 2020 #22
Harry is never going to be king. leftyladyfrommo Jan 2020 #23
I think it might have to do with love for their son womanofthehills Jan 2020 #29
So they come to the USA for a LESS RACIST environment? BamaRefugee Jan 2020 #32
More private life in US HipChick Jan 2020 #39
Dingdingding!! Codeine Jan 2020 #63
More like Canada. tinrobot Jan 2020 #67
More "normal" life, yes. Duppers Jan 2020 #47
They really aren't "Senior" members of the Royal Family Collimator Jan 2020 #44
Great post StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #54
Yes, he is obamanut2012 Jan 2020 #73
Actually, they are considered to be "senior" members of the royal BuddhaGirl Jan 2020 #89
I am a bit confused... Thomas Hurt Jan 2020 #53
No, it means they're a couple Codeine Jan 2020 #60
Truth Nature Man Jan 2020 #99
I don't mind this but I hate that he is no longer close to William helpisontheway Jan 2020 #66
The problem is that they came out with this statement and that's how the family found out. nt UniteFightBack Jan 2020 #74
William and his son George are the more important members of the family Kaleva Jan 2020 #79
That's cool bdamomma Jan 2020 #81
translation: Meghan cannot handle it Skittles Jan 2020 #84
long time ago i thought they would move to LA and Harry get duel citizenship.. samnsara Jan 2020 #85
Good for them. Fuck the tabloids. MicaelS Jan 2020 #93
Guest commentator on Hannity calls Duchess of Sussex "Uppity". Collimator Jan 2020 #100
precisely. stopdiggin Jan 2020 #104

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,637 posts)
1. I think this is a smart and sensible move.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 02:57 PM
Jan 2020

It cannot be easy living in the (sometimes) hostile environment that they are encountering.

I wonder what they're about to launch!

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
13. That's not what they said
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:35 PM
Jan 2020

They said they're going to "work to be financially independent."

Isn't that what people have been demanding of the royal family?

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
17. Meghan was already a multimillionaire and Harry is worth many 10s of millions and more always coming
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:42 PM
Jan 2020

in, when will they be rich enough that they don't have to announce that they are devoting themselves to making more money?

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
19. Oh, Good Lord
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:48 PM
Jan 2020

Saying "we want to work to be financially independent" is NOT the same as saying "we are devoting ourselves to making more money."

But haters hating is surely one of the reasons they're stepping away ... and haters still gonna hate no matter what they do.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
24. Yes it is, when the super rich say we are taking a break to devote ourselves to making us
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:59 PM
Jan 2020

financially independent, they mean more money.

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
25. Yes. Working to be financially independent usually means making enough money to live on
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 04:08 PM
Jan 2020

You seem to prefer the alternative - that they don't bother trying to support themselves but instead just live off of the money the British taxpayers have ponied up.

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
30. So you think they should just live off of the tax money and not bother to try to earn a living?
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 04:25 PM
Jan 2020

Why are you so opposed to them trying to earn a living? Will that harm you in some way or take something away from anyone?

I'm pretty sure that if they didn't try to earn a living and just lived off the millions they can get from the taxpayers, you and others would be all over them about that, too ...

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
31. I'll repeat it, they already have 10s of millions of their own money, Meghan alone was a
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 04:31 PM
Jan 2020

multi millionaire when she arrived from the U.S. on top of his personal wealth Harry gets almost a half million a year from his mom's will, they don't have to live off anyone, ever.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
87. Perhaps they like working.
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 05:40 AM
Jan 2020

There's nothing wrong with wanting to contribute to society by using whatever talents or skills you have.

Envy is an ugly shade of green.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
88. They didn't say they were going to start, stop, or change "working", they said they were going to
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 05:49 AM
Jan 2020

focus more on money.

Greed and obsession with themselves is an ugly shade of green, but we have always seen that kind of thing from monarchs.

Nature Man

(869 posts)
90. Folks at this level don't ever have to do a lick of actual work
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 03:43 PM
Jan 2020

their wealth "works" for them. They make money from money. Throw in some photo ops, charitable causes, maybe some Hollywood: you get the picture.

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
94. The envy and hate is pretty interesting
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 04:10 PM
Jan 2020

Some of it sounds a lot like the MAGA hate and resentment of the "elites."

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
95. It is interesting.
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 05:07 PM
Jan 2020

There is a big difference between asking for opportunity or fair breaks and being covetous.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
77. Or.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 09:58 PM
Jan 2020

They could mean that the royal family is limited in what it can put money into. Maybe they want to start a venture capital fund that figures out how to better feed the poor inexpensively to the poor, that is not something that a royal can do easily.

I will await until they give more details. They made it seem like they had been talking to the Queen over a period, if so, maybe they want to talk to her more now that they have finally made their decision.

Sounds like they want to live out of the spotlight, but good luck with that, they can't put a genie back into a bottle. Meghan was a famous actress and Harry was born to two of the most famous people in the world, one a future king, there is no way they can recork that longterm.

samnsara

(17,622 posts)
101. they cant even earn their own money as royals..it was an allowance...
Wed Jan 15, 2020, 04:39 PM
Jan 2020

..maybe they like earning their own way...

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
105. Read the thread, they are worth about 45 million dollars she alone brought about 5 million into the
Wed Jan 15, 2020, 06:59 PM
Jan 2020

marriage, now they are shooting for billionaire and have already started building their celebrity business.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
57. Why wouldn't one hate royalty?
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 06:37 PM
Jan 2020

Hating inherited wealth and power seems entirely reasonable and, dare I say, progressive. Harry may be a perfectly nice man, but I don’t feel even slightly bad about holding him and his ilk in contempt on general principle.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
59. Honestly, that's enough when you're dealing with
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 06:46 PM
Jan 2020

that level of wealth and influence being granted by dint of genetic lottery. Their very existence is an affront to decency.

“ Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.”

- Denis Diderot

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
62. So can black people just hate random white people because they were born white?
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 06:56 PM
Jan 2020

Because genetic lottery and privilege and everything?

 

Zolorp

(1,115 posts)
103. This is the sort of thing that turns off independents to Socialists
Wed Jan 15, 2020, 04:43 PM
Jan 2020

The contempt for anybody who has more than they can really turn off a lot of people.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
69. Meghan didn't inherit
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 08:40 PM
Jan 2020

She earned on her own.

As for Harry, it's not like he can pick his parents, like any of us.

NJCher

(35,686 posts)
33. are you sure on that?
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 05:09 PM
Jan 2020

Meghan wasn't all that successful, certainly not successful enough to be a multimillionaire-- and Harry--totally dependent on the Queen.

I would bet the impetus for this is the financial strings attached to the queen. They aren't truly independent. The money is there as long as they play the piper's tune.

They want to carve out their own life.

I think this is interesting because when she married him, I said it would be a cold day in hell before I'd ever give up my life to be a royal. I don't care about the $$; I would want to do what I want when I want. You really can't do that in such a situation.

Anyway, I saw this coming when they were looking for a house in CA.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
37. Yes, their current and ever growing personal wealth is estimated at 45 million dollars. Meghan's
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 05:24 PM
Jan 2020

personal wealth was estimated at over 5 million.

NJCher

(35,686 posts)
50. you are correct
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 06:01 PM
Jan 2020

I just looked it up. It's a surprise to me because I never heard of her before she married Harry and also I never watch TV programs of that nature.

Response to braddy (Reply #52)

Skittles

(153,169 posts)
86. it surprised me
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 05:15 AM
Jan 2020

I watched just a couple of episodes of Suits, I thought it was stupid and she was a very mediocre actress

Hekate

(90,714 posts)
48. I didn't know they were house-hunting in California! Probably not my neighborhood, but still--
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 05:57 PM
Jan 2020

An interesting development. The "younger son" is making some striking decisions to establish a life of his own and to stake a claim for happiness on his own terms for himself and his family.

Being born a Royal isn't nearly as wonderful as all that. A great deal of one's life is circumscribed by Duty -- Will (the firstborn and thus future king) and Kate have accepted that and worked hard at the job.

Good luck to them all.

Btw, I am entirely with you regarding having one's own life.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
97. Meghan acted on several
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 05:14 PM
Jan 2020

successful programs. She was a multimillionaire before marrying. Without intimidate knowledge of her spending, saving, or investments, there is no reason to question.

obamanut2012

(26,080 posts)
70. Markle was absolutely not a "multimillionaire" -- lol
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 09:47 PM
Jan 2020

Just stop with your fake news and misplaced hatred.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
75. Yes she was a multi millionaire.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 09:55 PM
Jan 2020

"Prince Harry's wife starred on seven seasons of the hit TV show Suits, managed her own lifestyle brand The Tig, and double-majored in theatre and international studies at Northwestern University. Marrying a prince? Well that's just another chapter in an already impressive biography.

All of those career accomplishments have added up. Celebrity Net Worth estimates her net worth at around $5 million. "

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
82. She was worth about $5 million before she married
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 10:12 PM
Jan 2020

I believe that does meet the requirements to be called a mulitmillionaire - especially since her husband's family's net worth is something around $88 billion.

How Will Meghan Markle's Finances Change Now That She Has Married Harry?
By Amy Fontinelle
Updated Jun 25, 2019


<SNIP>

What kind of money is the Duchess of Sussex bringing into the marriage? Celebrity Net Worth reports that 36-year-old Markle’s net worth is around $5 million. She earned about $450,000 annually as an actress in “Suits,” which she joined in 2011 (the show is entering its eighth season). She has also earned income from her women’s fashion line at Montreal-based clothing store Reitman’s, plus six-figure sums from her film appearances.

More:https://www.investopedia.com/insights/how-will-meghan-markles-finances-change-after-she-marries-harry/


Interesting article about how her marriage affects her personal finances - and what would happen if she renounced her American citizenship, how her tax situation would be affected whether or not she does.

tinrobot

(10,903 posts)
38. Maybe they'll just cut back on crowns, ermine capes, and royal processions.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 05:30 PM
Jan 2020

But seriously, financially Independent for them simply means no more royal or government money.

I don't think that's such a bad thing.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
41. But they already have 45 million and more guaranteed through celebrity, do they really need to
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 05:35 PM
Jan 2020

focus on it, and what about ending their destroying the planet with their conspicuous consumption and globe hopping.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
83. It's a discussion board.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 10:13 PM
Jan 2020

Are folks not supposed to comment if they have a different opinion than yours?

tinrobot

(10,903 posts)
46. Obviously, they have enough to be "independent", then.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 05:41 PM
Jan 2020

And if you want to focus on wealthy royals destroying the planet, might want to start with the Saudis.

obamanut2012

(26,080 posts)
71. Except they aren't -- your anger at them is strange and misplaced
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 09:49 PM
Jan 2020

And very disturbing, and almost word for word for Brits who hate Markle for being biracial. You are literally using their talking points -- why?

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
76. Lol, no anger here, but the jet setting gazillionaires are indeed conspicuous consumers
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 09:57 PM
Jan 2020

You don't need to make personal attacks to defend these rich people.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
80. They took 4 private jets in 11 days, all the while preaching about saving the planet.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 10:06 PM
Jan 2020

Hypocrites.

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
55. I interpreted it to mean they want to slowly transition into a private life.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 06:31 PM
Jan 2020

Not make a great big drama but gracefully bow out without making a huge scene

"Financially independent" means different things to different people I guess.

 

Tipperary

(6,930 posts)
68. I hear you. Both are millionaires.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 07:38 PM
Jan 2020

But somehow they have to “work” to be financially independent? I did that in my 20s. I hope the Queen cuts him off.

 

janterry

(4,429 posts)
6. No kidding, the time for monarchs
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:14 PM
Jan 2020

is long over.

The whole lot of them should retire from 'royal duties' and learn to live like the rest of us.

So sick of hearing about any of them.

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
12. I judge people by the content of their character, not by title or wealth
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:30 PM
Jan 2020

By all accounts, they're very nice people. Harry has taken up many of Princess Di's causes. I applaud their quest for happiness and normalcy.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
14. I'm merely commenting on their declaration to devote themselves to making more money, they are
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:36 PM
Jan 2020

already in unimaginable luxury and comfort, and great wealth.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
18. He is worth 10s of millions and she brought her millions into the marriage, they don't need to
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:45 PM
Jan 2020

devote themselves to making more, their millions will increase without that devotion to it.

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
21. Every dime that he's "worth" comes straight from the British taxpayers
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:52 PM
Jan 2020

Maybe he wants to earn a living that doesn't involve being on the "Civil List." Why does that piss you off so much? If they want to earn money to support themselves rather than have the British taxpayers foot their bills, what's the big deal? If they earn a living, does that take something away from you?

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
61. "Earn"?
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 06:53 PM
Jan 2020

They aren’t going to “earn” a thing. They’ll be granted positions of influence with cushy incomes on corporate boards or think tanks, all of it on the basis on Harry’s inherited title and royal cache.

Nature Man

(869 posts)
92. What makes you think that someone in his social class
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 03:54 PM
Jan 2020

will ever have to do anything to "earn a living" as is commonly understood? It's not like he's going to join the junior executive class and work his way up to CEO. Certainly won't ever do any actual work in his lifetime. Photo ops and pet causes aren't the same as toiling for shit pay in the hope of reaching the the top. Not the same as sweating $100 because the rent has to be paid. He's already very close to the top of the heap by just waking up and possibly having his phone on. You're talking about someone who basically "won the lottery" just by being born.

He isn't repudiating his hereditary titles and bloodline.

tinrobot

(10,903 posts)
40. My daughter went to high school with Meghan.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 05:33 PM
Jan 2020

They were in drama club together. She remembers Meghan very positively.

renate

(13,776 posts)
42. That is so nice to hear!!
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 05:38 PM
Jan 2020

I love hearing informed positive things about well-known people who seem nice... you never really know except from people with first-hand experience.

kimbutgar

(21,163 posts)
5. The London tabloids are so brutal on them
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:11 PM
Jan 2020

I think this a good move on their part. I never realized how many racists were in Great British. Always thought they were more civilized then us but they also got the Murdoch press blotch curse.

obamanut2012

(26,080 posts)
72. They loathe TRump, and literally have never kissed his ass
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 09:50 PM
Jan 2020

The Queen HAS to do what the gov tells her to do, and that was host Trump.

llmart

(15,540 posts)
16. Good move on their part.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:41 PM
Jan 2020

They may actually be able to live a somewhat "normal" life. Last thing we need is the disaster that happened to Princess Di.

TeamPooka

(24,229 posts)
20. Megan misses the states and wants to live a more normal life
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:48 PM
Jan 2020

Megan misses the states and wants to live a more normal life
That’s how I read that

DavidDvorkin

(19,479 posts)
22. Harry has reportedly long been uncomfortable with his royal role
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:57 PM
Jan 2020

Supposedly he was investigating relinquishing his royal titles and becoming a commoner, a few years ago.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,868 posts)
23. Harry is never going to be king.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:58 PM
Jan 2020

There is no reason for them to be front and center. They might as well go for living like they want to.

Harry is really popular just because he is a nice man that promotes important issues. I am sure he will continue to do that.

womanofthehills

(8,718 posts)
29. I think it might have to do with love for their son
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 04:13 PM
Jan 2020

They want him not to be a target for racists and to have a more normal life.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
63. Dingdingding!!
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 06:56 PM
Jan 2020

We have a winner! He can rake in bucks from a whole new set of rubes while paying a relative pittance in taxes.

tinrobot

(10,903 posts)
67. More like Canada.
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 07:21 PM
Jan 2020

They said North America and just spent 6 weeks in Canada. Canada is still part of the Commonwealth, so probably there.

Collimator

(1,639 posts)
44. They really aren't "Senior" members of the Royal Family
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 05:39 PM
Jan 2020

for all practical purposes. Harry has been in the spotlight because he is the son of the wildly popular Diana, whose journey took some dramatic turns.

The Queen has been a respected monarch for decades now; and as the latest Buckingham Palace photo op has demonstrated, she has three future kings lined up behind her.

Sure, Harry is the Queen's grandchild, but so are Princess Anne's kids (whose names I wouldn't know without looking them up) and Prince Edward's. Andrew's daughters did capture the public imagination a little, and they aren't seen as "Senior" in most people's eyes.

Princess Margaret was a big deal in her heyday, when she was young and fashionable, but how many people know about her two children?

For that matter, the makers of The Crown didn't bother to really given any story lines to the Queen's other uncles and aunt. Based on the series, you wouldn't even know that there were other sons and a daughter who could have taken on the throne if Elizabeth's father had truly felt incapable of the responsibility and something had happened to his two daughters.

One British Royal Correspondent likened this decision of the Sussexes to the abdication of King Edward the whatever. That is amusing. The British have plenty of other fancy fish to fry.

Oh, and I agree that the decision to "become financially independent" is not the same as "we want to make a butt-load (or arse-load) of more money." The statement implies that they wish to become financially independent from the relationship between the British taxpayers and the Windsor family. The fact that some people insist on putting words in their mouths that were not said is probably why they want to step back in the first place.

Best of British luck to you, guys! You may be attention seeking, but at least your clothes cover more of your bodies than the Kardashians.

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
54. Great post
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 06:07 PM
Jan 2020

Harry is senior in the fact that he's the Queen's grandson, son and brother of the future monarchs, and a royal prince born to the title. But now that William, the direct heir to the throne, has children, Harry becomes less and less senior as he gets bumped further down the line of succession.

I don't get the hate, either. Wanting to be financially independent is an admirable thing and in no way is equivalent to trying to make a boatload of money (although that's fine, too, if they want to and do it honestly and without exploiting anyone).

BuddhaGirl

(3,608 posts)
89. Actually, they are considered to be "senior" members of the royal
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 03:38 PM
Jan 2020

They are also "working royals" - but Charles seems to intent on slimming the monarchy.

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)
53. I am a bit confused...
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 06:06 PM
Jan 2020

Does this mean they intend to give up whatever money they have made and saved so far, or wealth they are entitled to because of their station or family relationships and they are going to start busking in the Tube, middle management gig, to cover a flat and other living expenses in London?

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
60. No, it means they're a couple
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 06:48 PM
Jan 2020

who are incredibly well-trained in the art of public and media manipulation, and they’re playing the rubes. Sad to see how many are eagerly licking up this vomit.

helpisontheway

(5,008 posts)
66. I don't mind this but I hate that he is no longer close to William
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 07:12 PM
Jan 2020

I read it started when William told him that he might be moving too fast with Meghan. I don’t think it was anything against Meghan. He probably just wanted him to take his time and get to know her better like he did with Kate. Regardless, they are a beautiful family and I hope they enjoy their time together.

Kaleva

(36,310 posts)
79. William and his son George are the more important members of the family
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 10:03 PM
Jan 2020

Harry may prefer to be more like his uncle Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex.

samnsara

(17,622 posts)
85. long time ago i thought they would move to LA and Harry get duel citizenship..
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 11:57 PM
Jan 2020

..but not til trumps gone. They will stay in Canada til then. Great move!!

Collimator

(1,639 posts)
100. Guest commentator on Hannity calls Duchess of Sussex "Uppity".
Wed Jan 15, 2020, 04:34 PM
Jan 2020

Now, in the interest of being excruciatingly fair, I think that we have all met someone whom we felt was pretentious or full of themselves, however you want to put it.

When Madonna started affecting a British accent, I thought that was a bit much. However, has the term "uppity" ever been used to describe a white person?

stopdiggin

(11,317 posts)
104. precisely.
Wed Jan 15, 2020, 04:45 PM
Jan 2020

virtually no question a toxic stew prevails ...
and yet .. even on this board, quite few want to make this about "rich, or royals, or celebrity .."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Harry & Meghan are going ...