Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"No underlying crime" marched into the graveyard of GOP talking points.
So here is what the GOP is fighting for, the right of a president to illegally overrule congress for personal political gain...which they're totally for, as long as there's never a Democratic president again
Senator Chris Van Hollen
This bombshell legal opinion from the independent @USGAO demonstrates, without a doubt, that the Trump Administration illegally withheld assistance from Ukraine and the public evidence shows that the president himself ordered this illegal act.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 925 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"No underlying crime" marched into the graveyard of GOP talking points. (Original Post)
kpete
Jan 2020
OP
marble falls
(57,102 posts)1. Moscow's Mitch sure screwed up dragging his feet. I am so glad he did.
Scotch-Irish
(464 posts)2. So..."high crimes and misdemeanors"....check.
But faux news will spin the hell out of it with their propaganda machine.
coti
(4,612 posts)3. OMB did NOT withhold funds for a "policy reason."
They shouldn't have said that- a "purported" policy reason, at best.
ScratchCat
(1,990 posts)5. All they are going to say is
that there is a difference between violating a statute and committing a criminal act and still claim no underlying crime was committed. They'd be right though it doesn't matter as Trump was well aware he couldn't legally withhold the money(given the steps they went to cover it up, he clearly knew it was wrong).
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)6. For sure
nt
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,349 posts)7. GOPers will drag it from the graveyard and prop it up on Fox