Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 04:44 AM Jan 2020

In retrospect, probably was not such a hot idea to schedule Trump's SOTU same day as his acquittal

So, schedule looks like this now that the senate has killed the idea of calling witnesses or subpoenaing documents.

Wed/Thur/Fri: House opening Statements
Sat/Sun/Mon (next): Defence opening statements
Tue/Wed/Thur (next) Senate questioning
Fri (next): Motion to proceed to closing statements/closing statements
Sat/Mon/Tue (2 weeks): Senate deliberations and acquittal. The deliberations and verdict were, I believe, spread out over 3 days in the Clinton Impeachment Trial.

Not sure why we held the articles and deliberately didn't send them until such time as the schedule works out that Toad will be acquitted the morning of the 4th and get to give a triumphant SOTU the evening of the 4th. Why on earth hand him on a silver platter that good of a day, especially as it gives him an opportunity to dump all over the news cycle that the winner of the Iowa caucuses should be dominating and enjoying. We also decided that the SOTU would be the 4th. Someone dropped the ball and wasn't thinking, like AT ALL. This kind of critical strategic miscalculation is really unforgivable in the most important presidential election year of our lives!!

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In retrospect, probably was not such a hot idea to schedule Trump's SOTU same day as his acquittal (Original Post) NewsCenter28 Jan 2020 OP
2016 was more important. We could have stopped all of this, and even saved Merrick Garland. NCLefty Jan 2020 #1
That wouldn't have saved Garland FBaggins Jan 2020 #2
Yes. 2016 was desperately important. If even those who voted Hortensis Jan 2020 #4
The SOTU was confirmed in advance Lexblues Jan 2020 #3
FTR, there are no Sunday sessions DeminPennswoods Jan 2020 #5
Have you forgotten who is in charge of the scheduling? TwilightZone Jan 2020 #6

NCLefty

(3,678 posts)
1. 2016 was more important. We could have stopped all of this, and even saved Merrick Garland.
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 05:03 AM
Jan 2020

92 million eligible America voters didn't even show up in 2016. That's 30 million more than voted for either major party candidate.

FBaggins

(26,739 posts)
2. That wouldn't have saved Garland
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 05:10 AM
Jan 2020

Clinton was never going to reappoint him.

The talk (here on DU) at the time was how to keep the lame duck senate from confirming him... to block her from appointing a more liberal selection.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
4. Yes. 2016 was desperately important. If even those who voted
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 05:45 AM
Jan 2020

had voted a bit smarter, everything would have been different. People on the left knew there would be massive election theft and that Russia was in it for the Republicans, but not enough focused on what that could mean, too distracted by the circus and candidates flashing shiny objects, to be alarmed.

 

Lexblues

(180 posts)
3. The SOTU was confirmed in advance
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 05:17 AM
Jan 2020

of this trial. Pelosi had no idea when this trial would begin or end. The repubs were gonna try to acquit Trump before SOTU no matter the date.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
6. Have you forgotten who is in charge of the scheduling?
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 11:18 AM
Jan 2020

Hint: it's not Democrats. I guess we'll blame them anyway.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In retrospect, probably w...