Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 501 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Napolitano: "ample and uncontradicted evidence" supporting Trump's removal. (Original Post)
triron
Jan 2020
OP
Caliman73
(11,742 posts)1. I know this guy has had some reprehensible views, but how is he still at Fox saying this?
He is spot on in this case. The case against Trump is solid and most legal people know it.
I am wondering when Napolitano will cease to be Fox's legal analyst.
getagrip_already
(14,800 posts)2. because fox viewers don't watch him.....
and 99% of the other commentators don't agree with him. It was likely one 30 second spot never rebroadcast or discussed.
Caliman73
(11,742 posts)3. Likely true.
Sad when you have to shield your viewers from information that may even slightly challenge their preconceived notions.
Not a News station at all. Simply propaganda.
Watchfoxheadexplodes
(3,496 posts)4. Fox audience does a WWE "WHAT???!"
And moved onto brown people caravans.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,384 posts)5. there are caravans again? shit. more "emergency" money to steal.