General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOk back to inherent contempt.
Why not pick the best chance for it? Would Giuliani be a good choice? Would love for the House to pick someone and give it a try out. Who would be the BEST choice to use it on? Maybe NEVER use it? Anybody have an opinion on this?
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)I think Giuliani's not a bad pick, but I'd try to pick someone I think would tell the truth under oath. My pick would be Mulvaney, because for whatever reason I think as obnoxious and despicable as he is, deep down he's not a "Trump guy" and that he would crack under the pressure and tell the truth.
EDIT: This is why I don't think deep down Mulvaney is a Trump guy.
Mulvaney Called Trump a Terrible Human Being in 2016
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/15/us/politics/mulvaney-trump-terrible-human-being.html
bluestarone
(17,030 posts)Mike 03
(16,616 posts)I think it would be hilarious.
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)Heck - I say Rudy and Mulvaney both.
Team Trump would need to sue to get them out of jail.
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)Trump will use that as an excuse to unleash even more and jail anyone with a dissenting voice. Laws? Trump believes the law is what he says it is.