General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI DON'T NEED DEBATES to know who to vote for (and against) in 2020, do you?
Trump is ALREADY whining that the debates "aren't faaaaaair"! Seriously. The big orange thumbsucking, knuckledragging TURD is ALREADY whining about debates.
I don't need the debates to know I'm going to vote for the DEMOCRAT on the ticket, do you?
Screw the debates. I don't need 'em!
Trump campaign warns debate commission the president may not participate if process is not fair
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-campaign-warns-debate-commission-the-president-may-not-participate-if-process-is-not-fair/2020/01/24/3664fb28-3ed0-11ea-971f-4ce4f94494b4_story.html
. . . . (I think the debate commission isn't likely to kowtow to his whining) . . .
The commission has a long-standing practice of choosing the moderators without any input or veto power by the campaigns. We pick with no consultation whatsoever, Fahrenkopf said, and campaigns are forbidden from communicating with the moderators ahead of the debates.
Commission officials say they pick individual journalists, primarily those with television experience, not to represent their networks but because of their own professional reputations. We do not choose a network or a newspaper, said Janet Brown, the commissions executive director. We look at the body of work of the journalist.
Trump is free not to participate. In 1980, before the commission existed, then-President Jimmy Carter refused to participate in a debate with his Republican challenger, Ronald Reagan, because he objected to the presence of third-party candidate John B. Anderson, whose poll numbers were strong enough for him to be invited. In that case, Reagan and Anderson debated without Carter.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)But that doesnt negate that debates and in my view town hall discussion are a good idea.
mucifer
(23,547 posts)We don't have a democracy if some citizens get more choices than others because they live in Iowa.
bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)This is just their attempt to give him cover.
Can you imagine him trying to debate Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg or Amy Klobuchar? It would be a slaughter.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)he was also concerned about fairness. The jokes just write themselves!
Watchfoxheadexplodes
(3,496 posts)Mark my words.
Remember Hillary debate where he skulked around? I'm betting he will do worse to Sander's to try and make him appear fragile.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)debate with Bloomberg.
Watchfoxheadexplodes
(3,496 posts)If Joe fails he would be my second choice as of this moment.
patricia92243
(12,596 posts)place, then it could be addressed as if he were there.