Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CousinIT

(9,245 posts)
Thu Feb 13, 2020, 07:47 AM Feb 2020

I DON'T NEED DEBATES to know who to vote for (and against) in 2020, do you?

Trump is ALREADY whining that the debates "aren't faaaaaair"! Seriously. The big orange thumbsucking, knuckledragging TURD is ALREADY whining about debates.

I don't need the debates to know I'm going to vote for the DEMOCRAT on the ticket, do you?

Screw the debates. I don't need 'em!

Trump campaign warns debate commission the president may not participate if process is not ‘fair’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-campaign-warns-debate-commission-the-president-may-not-participate-if-process-is-not-fair/2020/01/24/3664fb28-3ed0-11ea-971f-4ce4f94494b4_story.html

. . . . (I think the debate commission isn't likely to kowtow to his whining) . . .

“We pick the dates, we pick the places, without any input from the candidates,” Fahrenkopf said.

The commission has a long-standing practice of choosing the moderators without any input or veto power by the campaigns. “We pick with no consultation whatsoever,” Fahrenkopf said, and campaigns are forbidden from communicating with the moderators ahead of the debates.

Commission officials say they pick individual journalists, primarily those with television experience, not to represent their networks but because of their own professional reputations. “We do not choose a network or a newspaper,” said Janet Brown, the commission’s executive director. “We look at the body of work of the journalist.”

Trump is free not to participate. In 1980, before the commission existed, then-President Jimmy Carter refused to participate in a debate with his Republican challenger, Ronald Reagan, because he objected to the presence of third-party candidate John B. Anderson, whose poll numbers were strong enough for him to be invited. In that case, Reagan and Anderson debated without Carter.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I DON'T NEED DEBATES to know who to vote for (and against) in 2020, do you? (Original Post) CousinIT Feb 2020 OP
Personally, no I don't Sherman A1 Feb 2020 #1
Well considering most of the candidates will drop out by the time I get to vote I agree mucifer Feb 2020 #2
There is absolutely no chance he participates in debates. bearsfootball516 Feb 2020 #3
Poor widdle twumpy, feeling low and frumpy. Who knew that besides his interest in corruption abqtommy Feb 2020 #4
The ONLY person he will debate is Sander's Watchfoxheadexplodes Feb 2020 #5
Bloomberg. That would be worth the price of admission. tRump the coward would never agree to a SammyWinstonJack Feb 2020 #6
I do agree 100 percent Watchfoxheadexplodes Feb 2020 #8
It would be nice if they put an empty chair in Trump's patricia92243 Feb 2020 #7
No. ...nt 2naSalit Feb 2020 #9
Well, not in the general, no... Wounded Bear Feb 2020 #10

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. Personally, no I don't
Thu Feb 13, 2020, 07:48 AM
Feb 2020

But that doesn’t negate that debates and in my view town hall discussion are a good idea.

mucifer

(23,547 posts)
2. Well considering most of the candidates will drop out by the time I get to vote I agree
Thu Feb 13, 2020, 08:11 AM
Feb 2020

We don't have a democracy if some citizens get more choices than others because they live in Iowa.

bearsfootball516

(6,377 posts)
3. There is absolutely no chance he participates in debates.
Thu Feb 13, 2020, 08:19 AM
Feb 2020

This is just their attempt to give him cover.

Can you imagine him trying to debate Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg or Amy Klobuchar? It would be a slaughter.

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
4. Poor widdle twumpy, feeling low and frumpy. Who knew that besides his interest in corruption
Thu Feb 13, 2020, 08:25 AM
Feb 2020

he was also concerned about fairness. The jokes just write themselves!

Watchfoxheadexplodes

(3,496 posts)
5. The ONLY person he will debate is Sander's
Thu Feb 13, 2020, 08:55 AM
Feb 2020

Mark my words.

Remember Hillary debate where he skulked around? I'm betting he will do worse to Sander's to try and make him appear fragile.

SammyWinstonJack

(44,130 posts)
6. Bloomberg. That would be worth the price of admission. tRump the coward would never agree to a
Thu Feb 13, 2020, 09:22 AM
Feb 2020

debate with Bloomberg.

patricia92243

(12,596 posts)
7. It would be nice if they put an empty chair in Trump's
Thu Feb 13, 2020, 09:25 AM
Feb 2020

place, then it could be addressed as if he were there.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I DON'T NEED DEBATES to k...