General Discussion

Demovictory9

(32,457 posts) Fri Feb 28, 2020, 11:19 AM Feb 2020

Trump just tweeted that Steyer is "loser", "joke", "incompetent" while stock mkt tanking

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump just tweeted that Steyer is "loser", "joke", "incompetent" while stock mkt tanking (Original Post) Demovictory9 Feb 2020 OP

Wonder what set him off. Maybe Steyer's recent tweets? Mike 03 Feb 2020 #1

Okay, we are really fucked if Ivanka is the one working on the vaccine.. WyattKansas Feb 2020 #5

Maybe the banks accidentally sent FoxNewsSucks Feb 2020 #6

Come get your perfect coronavirus: dalton99a Feb 2020 #2

Oh maybe this: Steyer calls Trump's COVID-19 response Trump's Katrina? Mike 03 Feb 2020 #3

Actually a pretty smart tweet tman Feb 2020 #4

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)

1. Wonder what set him off. Maybe Steyer's recent tweets?

Reply to Demovictory9 (Original post)

Fri Feb 28, 2020, 11:24 AM

Feb 2020

Link to tweet

More likely, Steyer said something on TV this morning.

WyattKansas

(1,648 posts)

5. Okay, we are really fucked if Ivanka is the one working on the vaccine..

Reply to Mike 03 (Reply #1)

Fri Feb 28, 2020, 11:43 AM

Feb 2020

In the first link thread.

FoxNewsSucks

(10,434 posts)

6. Maybe the banks accidentally sent

Reply to Mike 03 (Reply #1)

Fri Feb 28, 2020, 12:23 PM

Feb 2020

Steyer's account and investment statements to MF45. He didn't like seeing what an actual billionaire's assets look like

dalton99a

(81,516 posts)

2. Come get your perfect coronavirus:

Reply to Demovictory9 (Original post)

Fri Feb 28, 2020, 11:28 AM

Feb 2020

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)

3. Oh maybe this: Steyer calls Trump's COVID-19 response Trump's Katrina?

Reply to Demovictory9 (Original post)

Fri Feb 28, 2020, 11:28 AM

Feb 2020

Link to tweet

tman

(983 posts)

4. Actually a pretty smart tweet

Reply to Demovictory9 (Original post)

Fri Feb 28, 2020, 11:30 AM

Feb 2020

If it gets Steyer to stay in the race. He only hurts Biden, who Trump clearly fears the most.

Reply to this discussion