Court says it has no role between House & White House, won't make McGAHN testify

[UTUSN]

It's on CNN but I'm on phone, can't link. House can request full court or SCotUS. Judge said courts can't babysit.

So, House should go to Arrests, I'm all in!1

[Laura PourMeADrink]

1. Shit

[UTUSN]

2. Since McGAHN testified to MUELLER, seems like House didn't use MUELLER report enough

[Thomas Hurt]

5. Who says Mueller asked enough questions or right ones?

[UTUSN]

7. So did the unredacted report even get to the House, plus all the notes?

[Laura PourMeADrink]

11. I sure do wish NYT, because they are good at it, would

Do a full report on everything that is outstanding and what the status is.

Sometimes something pops up in memory, and you think, "What happened to that?". Then you Google and nothing about it since 2018. Like Michael Cohen saying trump would tell them to lie about property values for tax purposes and use different values for financial statements. Or all the emolument violations. Is that all dead?

[Laura PourMeADrink]

10. Very true. Remember some legal analyst saying

We didn't need witnesses just go with report. I think if trump ends up being unstoppable we can point to the moment we did not immediately call the actions in the report impeachable. Or at a very meager minimum, Censure the bastard.

[Laelth]

3. It's a good thing Pelosi didn't wait for the court to chime in.

If the courts won’t enforce congressional subpoenas, Congress has no choice but to enforce them itself.

Congressional marshals, let the arrests begin. Congress may need to expand its jail.

Odd ruling. I would like to see the court’s logic.



-Laelth

[Sherman A1]

4. Horse Hockey

This is pure Horse Hockey.

[Poiuyt]

6. I know it's different, but how come everyone ended up testifying

against Bill Clinton?

[UTUSN]

8. 'cause STARR wrote everything as a porn encyclopedia.

[kentuck]

9. They "have no role"...

...unless it is something Trump requests.