Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFinancial Times: 'The US has tested fewer than 6,000 people'
Donald Trumps troubling coronavirus address... Perhaps the biggest fallout of Mr Trumps address was what he did not say. His most glaring omission was any plan to increase Americas capacity to test for infections. Epidemiologists say accurate testing is the single most effective method to counter the diseases spread. It allows the authorities to isolate clusters, trace the movement of the virus and make critical decisions on where the biggest risks lie. That is what countries such as Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea have done so effectively without resorting to the draconian measures taken in China.
The US has tested fewer than 6,000 people out of a population of 327m. By contrast, the Netherlands, with 17m people, is testing that many every day. South Korea, with 51m people, is testing 10,000 a day. The shortage of US kits stems from federal bureaucratic delays. One simple fix would be to import them from Germany, which are WHO-approved.
Mr Trump said nothing about tests other than that health insurers would waive co-pay charges on those being tested. That moderate incentive is irrelevant until the US has a capacity to screen more people. Mr Trump could have tackled the problem at a stroke by saying the US would import as many kits as necessary. But that would have undercut the spirit of his message: the epidemic comes from a foreign virus, he said; America must therefore narrow its access to the world.
https://www.ft.com/content/0be9b456-6414-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68
Ofcourse, importing testing kits would deny domestic 'outfits' the opportunity to profit from the epidemic.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 749 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Financial Times: 'The US has tested fewer than 6,000 people' (Original Post)
denem
Mar 2020
OP
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)1. Trump likes the corona numbers where they are, you see?
No tests, no cases.
It's that simple.
Why should his numbers double for something that's not his fault?
John Fante
(3,479 posts)2. If there were any doubts that Trump is the worst president
in history, they've been erased now. A quarantine is all but inevitable now.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)3. Block... then take credit...
lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)4. South Korea offered us test kits FOR FREE weeks ago.
Trump admin turned them down... don't expect them to take the German test kits.