General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat is America doing to lead the rest of the world through this crisis?
Is there any leadership at all by our fake president? Is there any desire to work with other nations, not in trying to pouch scientists, taking Covid 19 test materials from Italy and closing borders, but to be a leader who can bring the world together to defeat this virus and the subsequent economic collapse?
ansible
(1,718 posts)This country's leadership and response is a fucking joke
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)for the duration would be a BIG positive example.
But this is already also on the table in the EU, in particular here in locked-down Spain.
GReedDiamond
(5,313 posts)By definition, they don't have a mailing address, so how would they receive any benefits?
LuckyCharms
(17,444 posts)DonaldsRump
(7,715 posts)since January 20, 2017.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,733 posts)"Leadership" is not a possibility from this administration.
Jim__
(14,077 posts)He has no idea of what he should be doing now. He goes on TV and campaigns. That's all he knows.
tirebiter
(2,537 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 19, 2020, 01:15 AM - Edit history (1)
Is the first priority.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)Doodley
(9,093 posts)major challenges that the world faces and to rise to that challenge by collaborating, sharing ideas and resources and also showing by example? As a people, we are very privileged to live in a wealthy and relatively peaceful nation. We have a moral obligation to lead if that is what it takes to improve the prospects of the other 7 billion or so and the planet we live on.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)since it assumes that the US should have a leadership position in what should be a collaborative international effort? Europeans, Canadians, Australians, etc also live in wealthy and peaceful nations.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)Doodley
(9,093 posts)the problems that are not being solved. Absence of leadership leads to inaction and inefficiency. Where is this collaborative effort and how well is it working?
tirebiter
(2,537 posts)3 if want to include the Cold War.. The idea is to minimize damage whenever and wherever. And its supposed to be collaborative. Trump is an aberration.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)not so much? US troops helped hasten the end of WWI (which the US entered after it had been going on nearly three years); US didn't deploy troops against Germany until the Germans were already retreating in North Africa (after El Alamein) and on the Eastern Front (after Stalingrad).
tirebiter
(2,537 posts)Stalingrad wasnt over until 1943 for starters. A complete takeover of Western Europe by Russia would have led to a less than enlightening time and another hot war. Iow, that would have maxed damage. Communist revolution would have also gone crazy in Africa and South America. Not to mention the continued empire of Japan in the other theater of war. You dont seem to have thought this through.
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)They have zero respect for him and dont care what he says or does. They ignore him as much as possible.
SunSeeker
(51,571 posts)dweller
(23,641 posts)doodley
a damn shame
😕
✌🏼