General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumshave president obama come home and "walk on that picket line" with the chicago teachers union
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/have-president-obama-come-home-and-walk-picket-line-chicago-teachers-union-he-promised-2007/r084LdlBsenseandsensibility
(17,066 posts)It gives me no pleasure to say it will not. I hope I am wrong, of course. Rec'd for the spirit behind it.
Raine
(30,540 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)and having been witness to too many election year purges I won't explain my answer.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)His plate is kinda full doing his job right now, coupled with campaigning. I mean, we DO want to keep the ACA, preserve right to choice, equal pay for equal work, gay marriage, keep middle class taxes from being raised while the megarich get massive tax cuts, etc., etc.
A general statement of support in a campaign speech might be in order. But I doubt he even knows the details of the contract, which anyone would have to know before deciding whose side to be on. Just because it's a city with financial problems doesn't automatically mean the city is in the right, and just because it's a teacher's union, which we all support, doesn't mean the union's right.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Best not to, IMHO.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)A number of Democrats even have issues with teachers and other public servants striking. And, yes, I'm sure I'll hear a chorus of those aren't *true* Democrats and who needs them. But look at the polls. We need every vote we can get.
Also, by stepping into local issues, it makes him look smaller and more parochial. This is a local issue.
Not gonna happen, but let's go ahead and create another wedge.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)This is an issue between the Chicago teacher's union and city and state autorities. It doesn't involve the federal government.
Part of being President is recognizing what is, and what is not, your job. He can't handle the issues in all the states. Is he going to join the picket lines for a factory in Louisiana? Or in Alaska for the pipeline workers? If he started doing that, he wouldn't be able to take care of the federal affairs, like helping jobs for ALL Americans.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)This sort of thing is so unreasonable.
Old Union Guy
(738 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)This is a local issue, not a federal one.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)Obama angers union officials with remarks in support of R.I. teacher firings
"President Obama voiced support Monday for the mass firings of educators at a failing Rhode Island school, drawing an immediate rebuke from teachers union officials whose members have chafed at some of his education policies.
Speaking at an event intended to highlight his strategy for turning around struggling schools by offering an increase in federal funding for local districts that shake up their lowest-achieving campuses, Obama called the controversial firings justified. "
Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)It's a huge assumption to believe that Obama is on the side of the teachers
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Lots of attempts to suggest that the silence is merely political, which is nonsense.
All evidence indicates that Obama and Duncan agree with Rahm and his policies.
This is a serious, serious problem for Democrats and all Americans, not just in Chicago but down the road everywhere, because Democrats have historically been the ONLY ones standing between our kids and disastrous right-wing, profit-centered policies.
Education: The Big Enchilada
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002967097
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)foundation and the (putatively conservative) koch foundation work hand in hand, that's telling.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The hook is "federal funding."
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)education policies.
MADem
(135,425 posts)That doesn't mean that the federal government RUNS those schools.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)obama had an interest in speaking out.
well, the feds provide money to chicago too.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Obama had an interest in speaking out. I said nothing about Obama. I said "The hook is federal funding."
Certainly, the feds provide money to damn near every city and town in this nation, in some manner or another.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)these local disputes, edweird asked why he'd spoken about the firings at central falls.
you said federal funding.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1317112
or at least that's how i understood what you were saying.
MADem
(135,425 posts)some fashion.
Why is this news to anyone?
That does not mean that the Federal government is advised or required to weigh in on every issue, personnel or otherwise.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)on Central Falls but not appropriate for him to weigh in on Chicago? How so? How is one a 'private matter' and the other not?
MADem
(135,425 posts)There is no requirement for anyone in the federal government to remain silent if they want to weigh in on an issue either. But they don't HAVE to say shit, and that's the bottom line. This is a LOCAL issue--a Chicago issue. Not a state issue, not a Federal issue--unless those strikers get their checks straight from the Treasury Department--and we know they do not.
You seem to be playing the game that because Obama chose to weigh in on a VERY SPECIFIC school issue in a completely DIFFERENT STATE that involved federal funding, on a single occasion, that now he is OBLIGATED, in your mind, to weigh in on EVERY school issue in any and every state where federal funding might come into play. Or any school issue where you feel that it's "important" --you want he should stick his beak in. Like that would help. NOT. And like he WOULD interfere in the government of his close personal friend, his former Chief of Staff. Who in their right mind would even see that as a possibility, politically?
Say--I live on a state highway. Obama's stimulus money has been repairing the roads hereabouts. Why in hell isn't he up here patching that annoying and growing big ass pothole in front of my house....hmmmmmmm? Put down those PDBs, Barack, hang up the hotline, shoo away all your reelection staff and governmental advisers, get your ass into a plane, fly up here, roll up your sleeves and start heating up the tar and get to work!!! After all, he's made statements about federal stimulus money doing highway repairs....he'd better get his ass over here -- NOW -- and see to "my issue" -- PERSONALLY -- otherwise he's a hypocrite!!! Waaah!
I never said one was a PRIVATE matter--it's a LOCAL matter. LOCAL. What you are "claiming" is that the President is a King, who has his eye on every little sparrow and can override governors, mayors, and local officials with the sheer weight of his pronouncements. I'm claiming that this POV is foolishness.
This is the strangest thread I've seen on DU in a long time. I really wonder about the priorities of some folks, just dozens of days away from a critical election that has the potential to REALLY GIVE US SOMETHING TO CRY ABOUT..... and I also wonder about the rather shitty accusations that are flung, too in more than one thread on the topic--they really make the place suck. Just because people don't think Obama should weigh in on this issue, that automatically makes them "anti-union?" That's probably the oddest (and dumbest, in terms of basic logic) thing I've read on this board--sounds a bit disconnected with reality, frankly. Complete inability to perceive nuance. Blinkered thinking. Short term justifications. Yer either wid us, or your wid da terrists, I say!!!! That's what it sounds like...
See? You DON'T "see." I cast my vote for the President of the US--not the Superintendent of the Chicago Public School system. If anyone doesn't like that, too bad.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)Which, not surprisingly, you have not done.
Obama weighed in on union teacher terminations in Central Falls. He approved of them.
I find it rather odd that teh mostest liberalest president EVAH in eleventy hundred brazillion years is only interested in unions when he needs votes ("look at me playing kissy-face with the SEIU" yet is clearly a union buster in action ('cadillac tax', Arne Duncan, Rahm Emmanuelle, Central Falls, etc).
MADem
(135,425 posts)Rahm Emmanuel can handle Chicago.
The President has the UNITED STATES to worry about, not one city in one state with a Dem mayor.
This "every little sparrow" attitude is tiresome and just silly. It's not his JOB. He's got some shit happening in Libya and Egypt right now that's a bit more pressing...but no, he should dump that and attend to this very small gripe in the big picture (where the complainers are AT THE TABLE negotiating).
No one is dying if the parties have to continue to argue back and forth. That's the way life is, often as not. SuperBarack doesn't swoop down wearing a big cape and make everything all better. I find it odd that anyone who professes to follow politics doesn't understand the difference between local, state and federal responsibilities.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)Again, you brought up "federal funding" as the reason why it was appropriate for Obama to show his support for the termination of union teachers at federally funded public schools in a local Central Falls R.I. issue but not for union teachers in Chicago federally funded schools striking over a 'local issue'. Your initial reference was 'cryptic' at best and your later follow up was incomprehensible.
MADem
(135,425 posts)stomp your foot and call it "nonsense" because you aren't happy with the way the real world works.
See, if your view held sway, Obama would be delegating Libya and Egypt to Biden and personally supervising a little strike negotiation in Chicago.
Good thing your view doesn't hold sway!
One more time, since you didn't take the point the first time around--the President is in no way OBLIGATED to comment on every "teacher issue" every time one crops up. He's free to comment on what he'd like, IF he would like, but that does not mandate a response after every, or even ANY, event. If we were to apply this sort of situation to baseball, we might say that just because he occasionally watches the Cubs play ball and might remark at the score or a particular play, that doesn't mean he also has to watch the Nationals and offer similar commentary.
Your point, whatever it is (and it sounds like a whine that he's not paying attention to a local issue YOU deem "important" is just not compelling. Your continued insistence that he "owes something" to a union that seems to be handling themselves just fine without his help is frankly, bizarre, particularly given the recent very serious events that have taken place in the world. This insistence does not speak well at all to your sense of priorities, to put it as bluntly as I can manage.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)Why is that?
MADem
(135,425 posts)degree of associative context, but it never--ever--REQUIRES the President to so do. You seem to want the latter case, but you're not going to get it, no matter how much you yell at me.
Go back and read a few more times. You'll get it, eventually.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)isn't "allowed" to weigh in on any issue that isn't "federally funded"? You sure about that?
Just so we're clear - do you believe Obama supports the teachers (hypothetically speaking, of course)?
MADem
(135,425 posts)The President, like any other citizen, can speak about anything he damn well pleases.
The fact that some projects are federally funded presents an opportunity for the President to discuss certain issues. It does not mandate that the President must discuss these or any issues.
I have no idea what Obama feels with regard to this issue, but the bottom line is this--he's not the mayor of Chicago. He didn't hire those teachers, or the Superintendent of Schools, and he isn't responsible for cutting their paychecks or crafting their contracts. He's not responsible for their strike, their picket lines, or their negotiations, and anyone who thinks he should be is not dealing effectively with reality.
It's not his job.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)are state issues but that hasn't stopped the President from ordering Holder to go on an all-out jihad against them.
MADem
(135,425 posts)assessment, there. Bit of a swing and a miss, that assertion. There's room for the feds to become involved, unfortunately.
Background: http://www.marijuana-as-medicine.org/Federal%20&%20State%20Law.htm
Secondly, it is illegal to ship or receive marijuana by mail. Do not be fooled by individuals who claim they can legally ship marijuana because they live in a state or country where "marijuana is legal." Interstate shipment of marijuana is a federal offense. So is importation of marijuana.
If you do reside in a state that has enacted a ballot initiative "legalizing" medical access to marijuana it is important that you check with an attorney or local officials about the policy in your region.
Federal Laws
The Controlled Substances Act classifies cannabis as a Schedule I drug and defines it as a drug "with no accepted medical value in treatment." Despite its long history of use as a medication, cannabis is classified as a "new drug" and legal access is only possible through an Investigational New Drug Application (IND) issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). ...
I do wish the Federal government would grow up with regard to that issue, but it's not happening, yet. Some states have the MM issue on the ballot this year. My state is one of them.
That said, the analogy isn't a very good one.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Busting more MM dispensaries than Bush ever thought of all the while VIOLATING STATE LAW = Not a local issue.
Well, I''ll give you guys this, the mental gymnastics you guys have to pull off in order to Defend The President Whether He's Right Or Wrong is always an amazing thing to behold.
MADem
(135,425 posts)And don't be lazy, now--I haven't weighed in on this issue one way or another, so lumping me in with "you guys" (twice) just so you can flounce off in a huff is a very CHEAP shot. It's apparent that you don't want to even try to keep the discussion civil--you'd rather goad, bait and accuse.
The bottom line is this--no matter how anyone "feels" about this issue, your analogy SUCKED. lt didn't and doesn't apply. Local schools are not marijuana dispensaries, and the federal government does not approach them in similar fashion. Nor do states.
What's "an amazing thing to behold" is your fit of pique for no damn valid reason.
Have one of those nice evenings.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Dumbest political move he could make two months before the election.
egduj
(805 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)He shouldn't be inserting himself into local issues.
As a candidate that wants to win NC, FL and VA, all battlegrounds and all right to work states, not the best move.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Supporting the right to collectively bargain? Yes, absolutely.
Diving into this Chicago strike specifically? Horrible move politically when he has all the momentum right now.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)See above, he spoke out in support of firing the teachers in R.I. So apparently he does get involved when he wants to support something. If he got involved in R.I. why not Chicago?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Crickets, indeed.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)**crickets**
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)ps: the union teachers don't like charter schools. as a strong supporter of charters, not sure what your dog is in this fight or why you're advising obama to walk the picket line.
Moral Compass
(1,521 posts)And shouldn't... He can't as the President get directly involved.
Be nice to see him express some support.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)"I support the right to strike" would be potentially harmful, IMO.
mopinko
(70,127 posts)honestly, i wish he would shake the trees a little and find some federal funding somewhere to help the situation out. the state and the city are both really broke.
i don't necessarily think this is a great idea, but thought i would throw it out there. but i think he and rahm could both look like heroes if they found some creative ways to deal with this.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)to get them out of a strike would be the second worst thing he could do, right behind marching with them.
mopinko
(70,127 posts)most schools districts are in trouble these days.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)This isn't a little bit of money we're talking about, and no, there isn't that kind of money just lying around in DC, waiting to be spent. It would have to be approved by Congress, and what do you think the chances of that are?
He is doing the right thing, he needs to just stay out of it.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)This one example shows the fundamental corruption in the way things are done here, said David Orlikoff of the Chicago Teachers Solidarity Campaign, a labor and community coalition growing out of Occupy Chicagos labor committee and supporting the Chicago Teachers Union.
http://www.newstips.org/2012/08/penny-pritzkers-tif/
dkf
(37,305 posts)...and twist Rahm's arm to come to an agreement.
RegieRocker
(4,226 posts)It's not a presidents duty to stand by or represent their constituents. No freakin way.
KG
(28,751 posts)Pisces
(5,599 posts)The people, not just teachers in Chicago!
cali
(114,904 posts)fucking stupid ass shit. yeah. let's frickin' hand the country to rMoney on a silver platter.
damn, I hate short sighted stupid shit.
mopinko
(70,127 posts)i would like to see him find something to say about this. i am sure there have been phone calls to rahmbo. but i thought for sure there would be a bunch of du'ers who would jump on this bandwagon.
course, half of them are ignoring me.
randome
(34,845 posts)I don't agree with your OP but don't be discouraged. All input at DU is good information.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)I support the teachers, but sitting presidents have never walked a picket line with strikers, not a one.
And if that precedent were to be broken it should not be for what is in the end a local labor dispute.
Hey Jude
(67 posts)"If American workers are being denied their right to organize and collectively bargain when I'm in the White House, I will put on a comfortable pair of shoes myself, I'll will walk on that picket line with you as President of the United States of America. Because workers deserve to know that somebody is standing in their corner."
MADem
(135,425 posts)http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-teacher-strike-expected-to-go-into-2nd-day-20120910,0,4057997.story
Negotiations continue. No unions have been declared "illegal." No union leaders have been beaten and dragged off to a gulag.
I don't take the point. It's very DRAMATIC quote, certainly, but it doesn't apply to this situation.
DemocratsForProgress
(545 posts)can you explain the point you're trying to make?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Not gonna happen.
Proles
(466 posts)As others have mentioned already, this isn't even a state issue. We're talking about a single city. Granted, it's a city that Obama lived in, and one in which Rahm Emanuel (a friend of Obama), is now mayor of... but that's actually more of a reason not to go.
I'm sorry, but I'd place much more importance on keeping the Presidency, Senate, and gaining the House, than having Obama perform some symbolic march through the streets.
Obama didn't get involved with the whole Scott Walker recall thing. I wanted him to at the time, but looking back it was probably the best decision. People just don't seem to take kindly to Presidents meddling in state or local affairs. There are times where it's politically opportune, but this is definitely not one of them.
Reader Rabbit
(2,624 posts)NEA and AFT are in his pocket, regardless of how detrimental their stances have been to their members. So he isn't going to take any steps that help rank-and-file teachers. That's not where the money and the power are. He's already beholden to the business interests who are weaseling their way into the tax-payer trough via test scores, data, charter schools, and privatization. Those are his big donors, as well as his basketball and golf playing buddies.
As far as he's concerned, public school teachers can go jump.
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)Waaaaaay more important than what's going on in Libya. More important than the economy, the election, the land dispute between China and the rest of Pacific Asia... Yep. He's going to get involved in a local issue instead of dealing with all that other stuff. Sure. Uh huh.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Right now, President Obama has some other things that need dealing with. I know you posted this on Monday, but some stuff has happened since then that is requiring his attention. I'm sure the teacher's union will continue to make their excellent points. I'm hopeful that they will succeed.
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)Not getting their way is NOT the same thing as being denied the right to organize and bargain. That's exactly what they're doing.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)The expectation seems to mismatch with reality. The last time he weighed in a somewhat similar situation, it sure didn't indicate an inclination to don any walking shoes and advances corporate education by policy design.