Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,685 posts)
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:41 PM Sep 2012

What is to keep private insurance companies from discriminating against

Democrats if Romney wins and the whole health care field is privatized? I mean more dems that republicans have skipped having health insurance in the past and the Republicans are in no hurry to have that fixed. Don't know if the two are related. But with databases on how people vote in existance and such, what would it take for private insurance corporations and corporations insuring anything to give better health outcomes to Republicans (like treating them for pre-existing conditions)? It would make for more Republican voters over time.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

onenote

(42,714 posts)
1. Financial self-interest.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:46 PM
Sep 2012

Refuse to sell insurance to half of your potential customers. Yeah, that's the ticket.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
2. Where is this true? First I heard of it.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:47 PM
Sep 2012
mean more dems that republicans have skipped having health insurance in the past

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
4. The law...
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:51 PM
Sep 2012

It would be a major HIPAA violation for one thing and probably a few other laws as well. If I'm reading you correctly you're concerned that private insurance companies would give preferential treatment to repubs and would check voter rolls.

Am I misunderstanding you?

applegrove

(118,685 posts)
6. I'm just speculating. Thanks. Your post makes me feel better. But yeah - I do
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:55 PM
Sep 2012

think corporations in the future will be able to pay to get all kinds of information on their clients. Direct mail, political databases.

applegrove

(118,685 posts)
7. The database the political parties use, plus direct mail, etc. You don't
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:56 PM
Sep 2012

think both parties don't know how you vote according to your address?

applegrove

(118,685 posts)
9. We don't register to vote in Canada. And we get phone calls from two political
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:03 PM
Sep 2012

parties who know our names. Which represent the two parties we have voted for in the past. I'm sure the republican political machine is even more exacting. I've worked on a campaign and they have lists, street by street, with names and how strong a supporter each resident is. I don't think information like that is just going to sit dormant. Not when it could be used to make money and the Republican brand stronger.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
10. Maintaining a database of what people have said they're going to do
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:05 PM
Sep 2012

Is completely different than maintaining a database of how someone actually voted, which is the concern you expressed.

No such thing exists in this country.

applegrove

(118,685 posts)
12. Oh you hope so. Thankfully Obama is winning and we will not have
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:07 PM
Sep 2012

to worry about unregulated private health care for all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What is to keep private i...