Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 10:23 AM Sep 2012

Ari Fleischer Uses 'Truther' Slur to Blunt Criticism Of NY Times story.

Ari Fleischer Uses 'Truther' Slur to Blunt Criticism That the Bush White House Received More Bin Laden Warnings Than Were Previously Known
Matt Welch|Sep. 11, 2012 9:46 am

In The New York Times today, journalist Kurt Eichenwald writes a 9/11 anniversary op-ed asserting that there are many more pre-Sept. 11 documents aside from the infamous Aug. 6, 2001 presidential daily brief warning the Bush administration that Osama bin Laden was planning to attack the United States. The nut of Eichenwald's argument:

SNIP



Regardless, these two reaction-tweets to the op-ed by former Bush administration spokesman Ari Fleischer are just crazy-wrong:

Disgusting op-ed in NYT by a truther implying Bush knew of 9-11/let it happen. NYT decries lack of civility, then adds to it.

— Ari Fleischer (@AriFleischer) September 11, 2012
How can the NYT ridicule birthers then make their op-ed page home to a truther??

— Ari Fleischer (@AriFleischer) September 11, 2012


To state what should be the obvious, asserting that there was more relevant pre-attack intelligence than previously known, and criticizing the administration for undervaluing it, is an entirely different category of commentary than claiming that "Bush knew." If Eichenwald is a "truther," there is no evidence of it in this op-ed. Fleischer's blurt is the kind of mistake that immediately calls to mind the phrase "reading incomprehension," but I think it's something a bit more insidious than that.


SNIP..


http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/11/working-title



7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
1. Hey, let's all hear what the Spinmeister to the worst admin EVER has to say!!!
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 10:28 AM
Sep 2012

Because America can't go on even ONE SECOND on the anniversary of the worst attack on American soil without hearing from the BewSh B.S. slinger himself! Please, Ari, keep covering up and spinning your way around the massive incompetence that was the Rice/Rummy/Cheney/Wolfowitz/Little Boots regieme. PLEASE, TELL US HOW BEWSH DID THE BEST JOB HE COULD WHILE IGNORING THE MULTIPLE WARNINGS!!

Jagoff.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
3. Ari should watch what he says....
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 10:31 AM
Sep 2012

he is after all the mouthpiece of those who failed to keep America safe.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
4. I'm hopeful truther becomes the title of a hero who exposes 9-11 truths, rather than a pejorative
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 10:35 AM
Sep 2012


The NYTimes story goes a long way towards that goal.

We have much to learn about 9-11. Hopefully this story helps people begin to lift the fog and maybe begin doing some real research.

lastlib

(23,244 posts)
6. "Methinks he doth protest too much."
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 10:43 AM
Sep 2012

STFU, Ari! Your boss and his neocon buddies did NOTHING to stop it--despite NUMEROUS WARNINGS!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ari Fleischer Uses 'Truth...