Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 01:34 PM Sep 2012

RedState.com to ban users quoting FACT CHECKERS (not snark, these idiots really mean it)

Really? Doesn't this sum up all of modern conservativism?
When all the facts are against you, blame the fact-checkers. . .

So check out this post by Conservative RedState.com front pager streiff. It is just pathetic.


Quote a FactChecker Earn a Ban
In the past we’ve had a policy of banning people who argue in bad faith. As Politifact, and the whole menagerie of “fact checking” organizations have demonstrated themselves to be slavishly attached to the Administration’s nether regions I will consider quoting any of them, in a non-ironic way, as being evidence of arguing in bad faith and worthy of a ban.

What do you think?


I think you just divorced reality.
Mitt Romney created 100 million jobs as Gov of Massachusetts. Disagree? YOU'RE BANNED!

It's like open bar for liars. A place where lies and falsehoods can never be proven false. And CNN pays the founder of RedState.com Erick Erickson for his "commentary", the same guy who will now ban you from his website if you quote fact-checkers at him. I guess when CNN introduces Erickson they will have to ad a caveat to his byline (Founder of RedState.com, statements made at RedState.com are not intended to be a factual statement.)

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/11/1130399/-RedState-com-to-ban-users-quoting-FACT-CHECKERS-not-snark-these-idiots-really-mean-it
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RedState.com to ban users quoting FACT CHECKERS (not snark, these idiots really mean it) (Original Post) Playinghardball Sep 2012 OP
Wow. Just wow. BumRushDaShow Sep 2012 #1
Once again, "Real vs. Onion headline" rears it ugly toothless head! bullwinkle428 Sep 2012 #2
When Facts Are Against You erpowers Sep 2012 #3
Damn. Solly Mack Sep 2012 #4
Down the rabbit hole. mnhtnbb Sep 2012 #5

BumRushDaShow

(129,092 posts)
1. Wow. Just wow.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 01:38 PM
Sep 2012

Looks like whatever sane rethugs who are left are letting their dregs burn themselves out and then one day they will pick themselves up and start all over. Meanwhile the rest of us have to suffer through the insanity.

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
3. When Facts Are Against You
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 02:42 PM
Sep 2012

When facts are against you just ban facts. So who or what are people supposed to quote. If Paul Ryan blames President Obama for the closure of a auto plant can we quote our calendars? If Paul Ryan or Mitt Romney claim President Obama cut $700+ billion from Medicare can we quote their budgets? If Paul Ryan or Mitt Romney claim President Obama gutted the welfare work requirement can we quote the Health and Human Services memo concerning the subject. I do not think the problem for Romney/Ryan is the fact checkers. The problem is the facts.

CNN should bring this up with Eric Erickson. If he does not want to reverse his stance maybe it is time to let Erickson go. People like Erickson should be brought on TV and forced to prove their point. Give an example where fact checkers have conducted fact checks in President Obama's favor that have been factually inaccurate.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RedState.com to ban users...