Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe City of Milwaukee says 18,803 people voted in person today. Another 56,489...
The City of Milwaukee says 18,803 people voted in person today. Another 56,489 have returned absentee ballots, with as many as 40,223 still potentially in transit (issued but not yet returned). Total turnout: at least 75,292.
In the 2016 spring election, 167,765 people voted in the City of Milwaukee, so this is a steep, steep dropoff.
In the 2016 spring election, 167,765 people voted in the City of Milwaukee, so this is a steep, steep dropoff.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 982 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The City of Milwaukee says 18,803 people voted in person today. Another 56,489... (Original Post)
demmiblue
Apr 2020
OP
LisaL
(44,973 posts)1. Of course it's a steep drop off.
They had very few voting locations open, and not everybody who wants to vote is going to stand in line for hours during an epidemic.
bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)2. Normally, Milwaukee has 180 polling locations. They had 5 yesterday.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)3. Exactly.
It's a good bet many who wanted to vote weren't able to do so.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)4. Worse than even ours
Our state held its primary during COVID-19 on March 17, though a few days before stay-at-home order was issued (March 21). Turnout was low (around 38%), but not horrendous, due to large early voting and mail-in. I think that in addition to the risk, people felt that the nomination has already been clinched, and since sadly, a lot of people don't care about all the other (important) state and county races on the ballot, they didn't come out.
Despite fears over the coronavirus, Chicagos March 17 primary election voter turnout reached nearly 38%, far above the record low but down for a contested Democratic presidential race, statistics released Monday showed.
The Chicago Board of Elections, in releasing its official tally of the results, indicated that a combination of record mail-in ballot requests and early voting helped to boost turnout as the seriousness of the COVID-19 virus became more widely known on primary day.
Overall, 575,985 ballots were cast in the city 554,421 Democrat and 21,552 Republican out of 1,524,598 registered voters. Thats equal to 37.8% voter turnout.
In contrast, city turnout was 53.5% in the 2016 primary, when Hillary Clinton narrowly defeated Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders statewide for the Democratic nomination, while Donald Trump defeated Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and then-Ohio Gov. John Kasich for the GOP nomination.The 2016 turnout was even higher than the 52.7% in the 2008 primary, when then-U.S. Sen. Barack Obama of the citys Kenwood neighborhood defeated Clinton en route to capturing the Democratic presidential nomination ...
https://www.chicagotribune.com/coronavirus/ct-chicago-primary-turnout-coronavirus-20200406-dlvyyognmnbcflo2icdvrjn5ye-story.html